CAREER DEVELOPMENT WITH WORK MOTIVATION AS A VARIABLE INTERVENING ON PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES DISTRICT SECRETARIAT BINTAN

Authors

  • Aupa Sumake Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.
  • Jemmy Rumengan Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.
  • Yunazar Manjang Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v9i2.217

Abstract

In this study, researchers used respondents' data, such as gender, age and duration of work of respondents to be able to provide information about the characteristics of respondents. Where from the questionnaire distributed questionnaire as many as 60 respondents using census techniques. Data analysis with parametric and non parametric statistics using SEM-PLS (Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square) regarding research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, and discussion of the results of hypothesis testing and Path Path Analysis. This study uses path analysis (path analysis) to test the pattern of relationships that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables on other variables, both direct influence and indirect influence. The results of the study are as follows: The effect of the X3 variable on X4 has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0,05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 and X4 is significant. The effect of the X3 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0.039> 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 and Y is significant. The effect of the X4 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0.007> 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 on Y is significant. The influence of X1 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.009 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to X4 is significant. The effect of X1 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.006> 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 and Y is significant. The effect of the X2 variable on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.042 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X2 to X4 is significant. The influence of X2 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.007 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X2 on Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Aupa Sumake, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

Jemmy Rumengan, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

Yunazar Manjang, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

References

Bobbi Deporter dan Mike Henaki, Quantum Bisnis: Membiasakan Berbisnis Secara Etis dan Sehat, (Bandung: Kaifa,2009), pp.299-300.

Cambell. 2010. Exprimental and Quasi Exsprimental Design for Research. Chicago: Randnally.

Cohran. 2009. Teknik Penarikan Sampel. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Davis K. 2009. Prilaku dalam Organisasi. Terjemahan tim Erlangga. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Daniel Coleman, Kecerdasan Emosional Untuk Mencapai Puncak Prestasi, Terjemahan Alex Trikantjono Widodo, (Jakarta: Gramedia, 2009),pp.191-192.

Dessler. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Prenallindo.

Fazri, M. 2009. Organisasi dan Pengorganisasian. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.

Hersey. 2010. Management of Organitional Behavior. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

Hoy W.K. dan Miskel. 2009. Behavior in Organisation: System Approach to Managing. Philippines: Addison Publishing Company, Inc.

John M. Ivancevich and Michael T. Matteson, Organizational Behavior and Management, (New York: McGraw-Hill,2002),p.206.

John W. Newstrom and Keith Davis, Organizational Behavior, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009),p.97.

Khaddafi Muammar, Wahyuddin, heikal Mohd, falahuddin and maulida Rahmatul (2018), "Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanism, Independence and Management of Earnings Integrity of Financial Statements" Journal Quality Access to Success, Vol. 19, No. 164/June 2018.

Khaddafi Muammar, Raza Hendra, Heikal Mohd (2015), "Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Budget Adequacy On Individual Performance With Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable" International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. III, Issue 2, Feb 2015.

Meiyer. 2010. Pendekatan Manusiawi dan Organisasi Terhadap Pembagian Kerja. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

Michael O’Malley, Creating Commitment : How to Attaract and Retain Talented Employees by Building Relationship That Last, (New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc, 2009),p.1-3.

Nawawi, Hadari dan Martini. 2010. Kepemimpinan yang Efektif. Yogyakarta Gajah Mada University.

Pamungkas Davit Imang, Ghazali Imam, Ahmad Tarmizi and Khaddafi Muammar (2018), "Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Preventing Accounting Fraud: A Study of Fraud Pentagon Model", Journal of Applied Economic Sciences Volume XIII, Issue 2 (56), Spring 2018.

Richard H. Axelrod, Term of Engagement: Changing The Way, We Change Organization, (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher, 2010),p.116.

Ridwan. (2009). Metode & Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Edisi I. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Rumengan, Jemmy. 2010. Metodelogi Penelitian dengan SPSS. Batam. Uniba Press.

Rumengan, Jemmy. 2015. Metodologi Penelitian dengan SPSS. Edisi Kedua. Batam: Uniba Press.

Salusu, J. 2010. Pengambilan Keputusan Sitrategik Jakarta:

Grasindo.Siagian Sondang P. 2009. Teori dan Praktik Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sedarmayanti, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, edisi I, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Sters, RM. 2010. Strategic Management. Singapore: McGraw Hill Book Company.

Sters, R.M. 2009. Motivation and Work Behavior. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc.

Sudjana. 2009. Metode Statistik. Bandung Tarsito

Thamrin Abdullah, Hubungan Motivasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja dan Kemampuan Manajerial atasan dengan Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai di Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Timpe, A Dale. 2012. Kinerja. Terjemahan Sofyan Cikmat Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Asri Media.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-20