DETERMINATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, COMPETENCE, WORK ENVIRONMENT WITH JOB SATISFACTION AS A VARIABLE INTERVENING AGAINST DISTRICT OFFICERS PERFORMANCE BATAM CITY

Authors

  • T. AKBAR Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i3.572

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 103. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely organizational culture, competence, work environment, job satisfaction and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.002 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.038 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.010 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.006 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.006 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.002 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.

Author Biography

T. AKBAR, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, 2015. Evaluasi Kinerja SDM, Bandung, Penerbit Rafika Aditama.

Byars, L.L., and L. W., Rue, 2015, Human Resources Management, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, hal. 275.

Duwi Priyatno, 2015. Paham Analisa Statistik Data Dengan SPSS, Penerbit Mediakom Krasak Timur Yogyakarta. Hal. 8

Hasibuan, M., 2015, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bumi Aksara, Indonesia Jakarta, hal. 202

Kinicki, Angelo and R. Kreitner, 2015, Organizational Behavior Key concepts skills and best Practice, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, hal. 125

Lupiyodi Rambat, 2015. Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa, Edisi 2. Penerbit Salemba Empat, Jakarta

Malayu S.P.Hasibuan, 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara

Nasution, 2009. Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah). Cetakan Kesepuluh. Penerbit CV Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

Nelson, D.L., and J.C., Quick, 2015, Organizatonal Behavior Foundations Realities and Challenges, Thompson South Western, United States of America, hal. 120.

Noe, R. A. , et all, 2015, Human Resources Management, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, hal. 436

Rumengan, Jemmi Prof. 2015. Metodologi Penelitian dengan SPSS. Penerbit UNIBA PRESS, Cetakan Pertama. Batam.

Rianse Usman, Prof, Dr Ir. 2015. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Eknomomi (Teori dan Aplikasi.) Penerbit Alfabeta, Bandung

Sugiyono, Prof, Dr. 2020. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Cetakan Keempat. Penerbit Alfabeta, Bandung

Pack, S.M. dan B.W. Soetjipto, 2015. Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Organizational Support for NCAA Athletic Administrator, OhioLink ETD, 177.

Rahma, S., Suhandana, G.A., dan Suarni, Ni Kt. 2015, “Kontribusi Efektivitas Kepemimpinan, Budaya Organisasi Dan Etos Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai Balai Diklat Keagamaan Denpasarâ€. e-Journal, Vol 4: 1-12.

Robbin SP dan Judge TA, 2015. Organizational Behavior (Terjemahan; Perilaku Organisasi). Penerbit Salemba Empat Jakarta.

Robbins, S.P., and T.A., Judge, 2015, Organizational Behavior, Pearson Prentice Hall, United State Of America, New York, hal. 113

Rucky S A. 2015. Sistem Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.

Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA

Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.

Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.

Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.

Sarwono, S.W. 2015. Sumber Daya Manusia Kunci Sukses Organisasi, Jakarta, Lembaga Manajmen Universitas Indonesia.

Simanjuntak, 2015. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja, Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta

Suranto, AW. 2015. Komunikasi Perkantoran, Cetakan Pertama Media Wacana Jogyakarata.

Sumaryadi, I Nyoman, 2015. Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Otonom & Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Jakarta, Citra Utama.

Tjiptono Fandy Ph.D. 2015. Service, Quality & Satisfaction, Edisi 3. Penerbit CV Andi Offset, Yogyakarta

Tika H. Moh. Pabundu, 2015. Budaya Organisasi dan Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan, Cetak-an Pertama, PT. Bhumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Tisnawati Sule, Ernie dan Kurniawan Saefullah. 2015. Pengantar Manejemen Edisi Pertama. Jakarta : Kencana.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09