DETERMINATION OF EDUCATION, TRAINING AND MOTIVATION WORK WITH JOB SATISFACTION AS A VARIABLE OF MEDIATOR ON THE PERFORMANCE OF REGIONAL INSPECTORATE OFFICERS RIAU ISLANDS PROVINCE

Authors

  • Tri Yuli Widyastuti Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i3.573

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 69. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely education, training, work motivation, job satisfaction and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The influence of the variable X3 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.018 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 on X4 is significant. The effect of the X3 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 on Y is significant. The influence of the variable X4 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.005 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X4 on Y is significant. The influence of the variable X1 to X4 has a P-Values value of 0.034 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to X4 is significant. The influence of the variable X1 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.005 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 on Y is significant. The influence of the variable X2 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence of X2 on X4 is significant. The influence of the variable X2 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.027 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X2 on Y is significant.

Author Biography

Tri Yuli Widyastuti, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Amstrong, Michael, dan Murlis, Helen. 2011. Manajemen Imbalan: Strategi dan Praktik Remunerasi. Terjemahan Sofyan Cikmat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2010. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (EdisiRevisi). Jakarta: BumiAksara

Asnawi, S. 2011. Aplikasi Psikologi dalam Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Jakarta: Pusgrafin.

Azwar, Saifuddin. 2011. Penyusunan Skala Psikolog.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bernardin, John. 2011. Human Resource Managemen.New York: McGraw-Hill

Chuck, Williams. 2011. Manajemen. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Effendi, Syahril. 2011.Perencanaan Sumber Daya Manusia, Medan: Profesional Press.

Flamholtz, E. 2010. Corporate culture and the bottom line, European Management Journal. 19(3).

Furtwengler, Dale. 2010. Penilaian Kinerja.Yogyakarta: Andi.

Gomes, Faustino Cardoso. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Gordon, Judith R. 2011. Organizational Behavior: A Diagnostic Approach, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hasibuan. M. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Jakarta.

Kerlinger, Fred N. & Howard B. Lee. 2010. Foundations of Behavioral Research, Furth Worth: Harcout College Publisher.

Kolb, D.A., J.M. Osland and I.M. Rubin. 2010. Organizational Behavior.New Jersey : Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Kotter, John P, & Heskett, James L. 2011. Dampak Budaya Perusahaan Terhadap Kinerja. Jakarta: Prehallindo. Judul Asli : Corporate Culture and Performance.

Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Luthans, Fred. 2010. Organizational Behavio.Boston: McGraw Hill.

Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2011. Perilaku dan Budaya Organisasi. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.

Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA

Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.

Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.

Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.

Sarwoto. 2010. Dasar-dasar Organisasi dan Manajemen. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Schein, E. H. 2011. Organizational Culture and Leadership.San Fransico, CA: Joersey Bass.

Schemoerhorn, et.al. 2011. Managing Organizational Behaviour. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09