DETERMINATION OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT, WORK DISCIPLINE AND HUMAN COMPETENCE COMPETENCY WITH WORK SATISFACTION AS A VARIABLE INTERVENING TO EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT KARIMUN DISTRICT

Authors

  • Neri Maiyusan Batam University
  • I Wayan Catrayasa Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i2.627

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 99. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely career development, work discipline, HR competence, job satisfaction and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.032 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.011 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.006 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.033 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.007 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Neri Maiyusan, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

I Wayan Catrayasa, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Cohran. 2011. Teknik Penarikan Sampel. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Davis K. 2011. Prilaku dalam Organisasi. Terjemahan tim Erlangga. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Daniel Coleman, Kecerdasan Emosional Untuk Mencapai Puncak Prestasi, Terjemahan Alex Trikantjono Widodo, (Jakarta: Gramedia, 2009),pp.191- 192.

Dessler. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Prenallindo.

Fazri, M. 2011. Organisasi dan Pengorganisasian. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.

Hersey. 2010. Management of Organitional Behavior. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

Hoy W.K. dan Miskel. 2011. Behavior in Organisation: System Approach to Managing. Philippines: Addison Publishing Company, Inc.

John W. Newstrom and Keith Davis, Organizational Behavior, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011),p.97.

Meiyer. 2010. Pendekatan Manusiawi dan Organisasi Terhadap Pembagian Kerja. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

Michael O’Malley, Creating Commitment : How to Attaract and Retain Talented Employees by Building Relationship That Last, (New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc, 2011),p.1-3.

Khaddafi Muammar, Wahyuddin, heikal Mohd, falahuddin and maulida Rahmatul (2018), "Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanism, Independence and Management of Earnings Integrity of Financial Statements" Journal Quality Access to Success, Vol. 19, No. 164/June 2018.

Khaddafi Muammar, Raza Hendra, Heikal Mohd (2015), "Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Budget Adequacy On Individual Performance With Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable" International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. III, Issue 2, Feb 2015

Nawawi, Hadari dan Martini. 2010. Kepemimpinan yang Efektif. Yogyakarta Gajah Mada University.

Richard H. Axelrod, Term of Engagement: Changing The Way, We Change Organization, (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher, 2010),p.116.

Ridwan. (2009). Metode & Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Edisi I. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Rumengan, Jemmy. 2010. Metodelogi Penelitian dengan SPSS. Batam. Uniba Press.

Rumengan, Jemmy. 2015. Metodologi Penelitian dengan SPSS. Edisi Kedua. Batam: Uniba Press.

Rumengan Muhammad Tammy Ikbal, Rumengan Jemmy, Manjang Yunazar (2019), "Work Spirit Determination, Work Responsibility And Work Facilities With Work Motivation As Intervening Variables To Performance Of University Employees Batam Using SEM-PLS (Partial Least Square)" Zona Manajerial Vol: 9 No: 1, 2019.

Rumengan Muhammad Tommy Arby, Rumengan Jemmy, Manjang Yunazar (2019), "Work Discipline Determination, Competence And Work Environment With Work Satisfaction As Variables Intervening On Organizational Commitments Pegawai Batam University With Using SEM-PLS (Partial Least Square)", Zona Manajerial Vol: 9 No: 1, 2019

Sters, RM. 2010. Strategic Management. Singapore: McGraw Hill Book Company.

Sters, R.M. 2011. Motivation and Work Behavior. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc.

Sudjana. 201. Metode Statistik. Bandung Tarsito

Thamrin Abdullah, Hubungan Motivasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja dan Kemampuan Manajerial atasan dengan Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai di Universitas

Downloads

Published

2021-05-21