FENOMENA DINAMIKA KEPUBLIKAN DALAM HIRARKI RUANG KAWASAN PUBLIK KOTA

Authors

  • Ully Irma Maulina Hanafiah Universitas Telkom
  • Doddy Friestya Asharsinyo Universitas Telkom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/jpot.v1i1.654

Abstract

The public area of the city in general is currently experiencing rapid development due to economic growth and the influence of globalization. The public space is formed based on economic, social, political cultural interests, as well as developments and changes that occur in the current public space, making it limited and cannot be accessed optimally by the wider community. This is caused by the hierarchy of public spaces that are formed based on the functions that surround them. The purpose of this study is to reveal the phenomenon of public hierarchy in urban space in the context of its changes. This research is descriptive-analytical and based on theoretical and empirical elaboration. This approach is used to read public spaces in urban areas to get a reference for the interpretation of theoretical relationships from an empirical condition.

Author Biographies

Ully Irma Maulina Hanafiah, Universitas Telkom

Universitas Telkom

Doddy Friestya Asharsinyo, Universitas Telkom

Universitas Telkom

References

Carr, Stephen, 1995, Public Spaces, John Wiley & Sons.

Damajani, Dhian (2008), Gejala Ruang Ketiga (Thirdspace) di kota Bandung, Paradoks dalam Ruang Publik Urban Kontemporer, Disertasi, ITB.

Dick, H.W. and Rimmer P.J., 1997, Beyond The Third World City : The New Urban Geography Of South-East Asia. Urban Studies.

Ekomadyo, Agus (2009), Pengendalian Kualitas Arsitektur Kota Pada Ruang Publik di Kota Pekanbaru, Disertasi, ITB.

Groat, Linda and Wang, David. 2002. Architectural Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons.

Gehl, Jan, 1987, Life Beetwen Building, Island Press.

Krier, Rob, Urban Space, 1979, New York Press.

Karsono, Bambang , 2013, Keterikatan Tempat Pada Promenad Tebing Sungai Di Malaysia, Dissertation, USM, Malaysia.

Kostof, Spiro, 1999, The City Shaped, Thames and Hudson, London.

Lefebre, Henri, The Production Of Space, 1991, Wiley

Louis Wirth. 1938, Urbanism as a Way of Life.. The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 44, No. 1.

Norberg-Schulz, Christian, 1988, Architecture : Meaning and Place, Rizzoli Int. Publication, New York.

Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2006. Social Research Methods, Qualitative And Quantitative Approaches, Sixth Edition. Person International Edition.

Puspitasari, Popi (2014), Keterulangan Kehadiran sebagai basis pemanfaatan ruang publik di kampung Luar Batang, Jakarta Utara, Disertasi, UGM.

T.M. De Jong And D. J. M. Van Der Voordt. 2002. Ways To Study And Research, Urban, Architectural and Technical Design. DUP Science.

Rapoport, Amos 1980, Human Aspects Of Urban Form, Pergamon, Press, Oxford.

Rossi, A, 1982, The Architecture Of The City, Cambridge, MIT Press.

Salura, Purnama; Fauzi, Bachtiar. (2012). The Ever-rotating Aspects of Function-Form-Meaning in Architecture. Journal of Basic and Applied, 7086-7090.

Siregar, Sandi Aminuddin ,1990. Bandung—The Architecture of a City in Development: Urban Analysis of a Regional Capital as a Contribution to the Present Debate on Indonesian Urbanity and Architectural Identity. Dissertation. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.

Supriharjo, Rima Dewi , 2004, Developing Land Value Concept in Ampel Heritage Area Surabaya City, Dissertation, UGM.

Wibisono, Bambang Hari , 2001, Transformation of Jalan Malioboro, Yogyakarta: The Morphology and Dynamics of a Javanese Street. Dissertation. Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-21

Issue

Section

Articles