LEADERSHIP DETERMINATION, COMPETENCE AND TRAINING WITH WORK MOTIVATION AS INTERVENING VARIABLES ON TEACHER PERFORMANCE OF SMAN 8 BENGKONG SADAI BATAM

Mujid Mujid, Jemmy Rumengan, Angelina Eleonora Rumengan

Abstract


In this study, researchers used respondents' data, such as gender, age and duration of work of respondents to be able to provide information about the characteristics of respondents. Where from the questionnaire distributed questionnaire as many as 90 respondents using census techniques. Data analysis with parametric and non parametric statistics using SEM-PLS (Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square) regarding research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, and discussion of the results of hypothesis testing and Path Path Analysis. This study uses path analysis (path analysis) to test the pattern of relationships that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables on other variables, both direct influence and indirect influence. The results of the study are as follows: The effect of the X3 variable on X4 has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0,05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 and X4 is significant. The effect of the X3 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0,000> 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X3 on Y is significant. The effect of the X4 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0.006> 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X4 on Y is significant. The influence of X1 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.010 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to X4 is significant. The influence of X1 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.010> 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 and Y is significant. The effect of the X2 variable on X4 has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0,05, so it can be stated that the effect between X2 on X4 is significant. The effect of X2 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.009 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X2 on Y is significant.


Keywords


ekonomi, manajemen, keuangan

Full Text:

PDF

References


A A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, 2009, Evaluasi Kerja SDM, Refika Aditama, Bandung

Agus Dwi Atmoko, Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai, 2011

Arep, Ishak dan Tanjung, Hendri 2009, Managemen Motivasi, Cetakan Kedua, Penerbit Grasindo, Jakarta

Fitrina Afrianti, Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Komunikasi Interpersonal terhadap Kinerja Guru pada SMA 6 Kerinci, Kecamatan Danau Kerinci. Pasca Sarjana, Universitas Pendidikan, YPTK Padang.

Gogy Bara Kharisma (2013), Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Koperasi Serba Usaha, Stya Usaha di Kabupaten Jepara. Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Handoko, Hani T, Dr.MBA dan Reksohadiprojo Sukanto, Dr.M.Com 1996, Organisasi Perusahaan, Edisi kedua Yogyakarta : BPFE

Ida Ayu Brmasari dan Agus Suprayitno, Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja pada PT. Pei Hai Internasional Wiratama Indonesia, Pasca Sarjana, Universitas 17 Agustus Surabaya.

Ismenia, Pengaruh Program Pelatihan dan Motivasi kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Kantor Kepresidenan Timor Leste, Pasca Sarjan aUniversitas Udayana Bali.

Jagarin Pane dan Sih Darmi Astuti, Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan Tranformaional dan Kompensasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai.

Khaddafi Muammar, Wahyuddin, heikal Mohd, falahuddin and maulida

Rahmatul (2018), "Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanism, Independence and Management of Earnings Integrity of Financial Statements" Journal Quality Access to Success, Vol. 19, No. 164/June 2018.

Khaddafi Muammar, Raza Hendra, Heikal Mohd (2015), "Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Budget Adequacy On Individual Performance With Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable" International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. III, Issue 2, Feb 2015.

Kistoyo (2011), Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Komunikasi, Kinerja, Motivasi Fisisk terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Kantor Dinas Kependidikan Kabupaten Pekalongan, Fasca Sarjana, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Kreitner Robert Kinchi Angelo, 2010, Perilaku Organisasi, Terjemahan Erly Suandy, Jakarta : Salemba Empat

Luthans, F. 2011, Organizational Behavior. New York; McGraw-hill Sugiono,

, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung Alfabeta.

Marihot Manullang, 2012, Managemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Medan.

Musriha (2013), Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Pelatihan, Kompensasi dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Departemen Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Kabupatem Probolinggo, Pasca Srjana,Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya.

Nurlaila, 2010, Managemen Sumber Daya Manusia I, Penerbit LepKhair

Pamungkas Davit Imang, Ghazali Imam, Ahmad Tarmizi and Khaddafi

Muammar (2018), "Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Preventing Accounting Fraud: A Study of Fraud Pentagon Model", Journal of Applied Economic Sciences Volume XIII, Issue 2 (56), Spring 2018.

Rivai, Vethzal & Basri, 2010, Performace Appraisal;Sistem yang tepat untuk Menilai Kinerja Pegawai dan Meningkatkan Daya Sing Perusahaan. Jakarta; PT.Raja Grafindo Persada

Robbins, Stephen P. (2009). Organization Behavior. 11th ed. Prentice Hall. New Jersey

Schein, Edgar H (2009), The Corporate Culture Survival Guide. Jossey-Bass Publ. Sn Fransisco.

Sudaryono, 2011, Aplikasi Analisys (Analisys Path) Berdasarkan urutan variable dalam penelitian. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Vol 17, No. 4, 2011

Suharto dan Budhi Cahyono (2012), Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi kerja Terhadap Kinerja Sumberdaya Manusia

Susandi Priharyanto (2012), Analisis Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk Regional IV Jawa Tengah, Daerah Instimewa Yogyakarta, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Dipenogoro Semarang.

Sopiah, 2010, Perilaku Organisasi, Yogyakarta, Penerbit Andi




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37776/jzm.v9i3.198

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Mujid Mujid, Jemmy Rumengan, Angelina Eleonora Rumengan