COMPENSATION DETERMINATION, TRAINING AND WORK ENVIRONMENT WITH WORK MOTIVATION AS A MEDIATOR VARIABLE ON WORK SATISFACTION OF PT BATAMMEC

Authors

  • Evi Sutiana Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.
  • Jemmy Rumengan Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.
  • Yunazar Manjang Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/jzm.v9i1.181

Keywords:

ekonomi, manajemen, umum

Abstract

In this study, researchers used respondents' data, such as gender, age and duration of work of respondents to be able to provide information about the characteristics of respondents. Where from the questionnaire distributed questionnaire as many as 65 respondents using census techniques. Data analysis with parametric and non parametric statistics using SEM-PLS (Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square) regarding research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, and discussion of the results of hypothesis testing and Path Path Analysis. This study uses path analysis (path analysis) to test the pattern of relationships that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables on other variables, both direct influence and indirect influence. The results of the study are as follows: The effect of the X3 variable on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.008 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 and X4 is significant. The effect of the X3 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0.021> 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 and Y is significant. The effect of the X4 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0.019> 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X4 and Y is significant. The effect of X1 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.012 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to X4 is significant. The influence of X1 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.050> 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 and Y is significant. The effect of the X2 variable on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.001 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X2 on X4 is significant. The influence of X2 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.007 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X2 on Y is significant. 

Author Biographies

Evi Sutiana, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

Jemmy Rumengan, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

Yunazar Manjang, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Andalas University, Indonesia.

References

Achmad Tjahjono. 2010. Kompensasi Intensif Sebagai Alat Untuk Memotivasi Anggota Organisasi Dalam Upaya Mencapai Tujuan Organisasi.â€Kajian Bisnis, No. 7, pp.34-41.

Arrizal. 2009. Motivasi Kerja Dapat Dibangkitkan Dengan Pemberian Tunjangan Pegawai. Kajian Bisnis, No. 17, pp.23-27.

Damodar Gujarati, 2011, Ekonometrika Dasar, Edisi Ketuju, Erlangga, Jakarta.

Dessler, Gary. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi Bahasa Indonesia Jilid 2. Jakarta: Prenhallindo.

Dessler, Gary. 2010. Human Resource Management 8th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Echols JM., & Shadilly H., 2010, Kamus Inggris Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Gramedia.

Gomes, Faustino Cardoso. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogjakarta: Andi Offset.

Guritno, Bambang dan Waridin. 2005. Pengaruh Persepsi Karyawan Mengenai Perilaku Kepemimpinan, Kepuasan Kerja dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja. JRBI, Vol.1 No. 1, pp.63-74

Hani Handoko. 2010. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumberdaya Manusia Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Hani Handoko. 2009. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumberdaya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Haryono. 2009. Pengaruh Karakteristik Pekerjaan Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dengan Mediasi Motivasi Kerja (Studi Pada Pegawai Badan Pelaksana Penyuluhan Pertanian, Perikanan dan Kehutanan Kabupaten Batang. Tesis Tidak Dipublikasikan, Program Pascasarjana Magister Manajemen, Universitas Stikubank Semarang.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Herman, Sofyandi. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.

Heru Kurnianto. 2009. Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Berdasarkan Definisi, Tujuan, dan Manfaat “http://jurnal-sdm.blogspot.com/2009/04/penilaian-kinerja-karyawan-definisi.html, Diakses tanggal 10 Maret 2010.

Khaddafi Muammar, Wahyuddin, heikal Mohd, falahuddin and maulida Rahmatul (2018), "Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanism, Independence and Management of Earnings Integrity of Financial Statements" Journal Quality Access to Success, Vol. 19, No. 164/June 2018.

Khaddafi Muammar, Raza Hendra, Heikal Mohd (2015), "Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Budget Adequacy On Individual Performance With Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable" International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. III, Issue 2, Feb 2015.

Lies Indriyani. 2009. Analisis Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Perawat Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Ekonomi – Manajemen – Akuntansi, No. 26, Th. XVI, pp. 117-127.

M, Manulang. 1984. Management Personalia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Mathis, Jackson. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Mahmudi, 2009. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogjakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

Masrukin dan Waridin. 2006. Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja, Budaya Organisasi dan Kepemimpinan terhadap Kinerja Pegawai, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Vol. 7 (2), Juni : 197-209.

McClellan, David . 2008. Teori Motivasi McClellan & Teori Dua Faktor Hezberg†http://kuliahkomunikasi.blogspot.com/2008/11/teori-motivasi-mcclelland-teori-dua.html, Diakses tanggal 12 April 2010.

Mudrajad Kuncoro, 2001, Metode Kuantitatif Teori dan Aplikasi Untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. UPP AMP YKPN, Jakarta.

Nawawi, H. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Pamungkas Davit Imang, Ghazali Imam, Ahmad Tarmizi and Khaddafi Muammar (2018), "Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Preventing Accounting Fraud: A Study of Fraud Pentagon Model", Journal of Applied Economic Sciences Volume XIII, Issue 2 (56), Spring 2018.

Panggaben, Mutiara S. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Ghallia Indonesia.

Rita Swietenia. 2009. Analisis Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Kompensasi dan Karakteristik Pekerjaan Terhadap Disiplin Kerja Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai (Studi Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kota Semarang). Jurnal Ekonomi – Manajemen – Akuntansi, No. 26, Th. XVI, pp. 96-116.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2010. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta : PT Indeks.

Sastrohadiwiryo, Bejo Siswanto. 2013. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Pendekatan Administrative dan Operasional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Simamora, Henry. 2014. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: SIE YKPN

Downloads

Published

2019-09-26

Issue

Section

Articles