DETERMINATION OF JOB ANLYSIS, COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE ORGANIZATION WITH THE MOTIVATION OF WORK AS A VARIABLE OF MEDIATOR TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THE LIBRARY OFFICERS AND ARCHIVES OF TANJUNG PINANG CITY

Authors

  • Riawati Riawati Batam University
  • Adnan Suhardis Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/jzm.v10i3.581

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 30. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely job anlysis, communication, organizational culture, work motivation and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.023 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.031 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.022 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.007 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.005 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.009 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.009 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Riawati Riawati, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

Adnan Suhardis, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Bobbi Deporter dan Mike Henaki, Quantum Bisnis: Membiasakan Berbisnis Secara Etis dan Sehat, (Bandung: Kaifa,2011),pp.299-300.

Cambell. 2010. Exprimental and Quasi Exsprimental Design for Research.

Chicago: Randnally.

Cohran. 2011. Teknik Penarikan Sampel. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Davis K. 2011. Prilaku dalam Organisasi. Terjemahan tim Erlangga. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Dessler. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Prenallindo.

Fazri, M. 2011. Organisasi dan Pengorganisasian. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.

Hersey. 2010. Management of Organitional Behavior. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs. John M. Ivancevich and Michael T. Matteson, Organizational Behavior and Management, (New York: McGraw-

Hill,2010),p.206.

John W. Newstrom and Keith Davis, Organizational Behavior, (New York:

McGraw-Hill, 2011),p.97.

Meiyer. 2010. Pendekatan Manusiawi dan Organisasi Terhadap Pembagian Kerja. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

Michael O’Malley, Creating Commitment : How to Attaract and Retain Talented Employees by Building Relationship That Last, (New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc, 2011),p.1-3.

Richard H. Axelrod, Term of Engagement: Changing The Way, We Change Organization, (San Francisco:

Berrett-Koehler Publisher, 2010),p.116.

Ridwan. (2011). Metode & Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Edisi I. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.

Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA

Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.

Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.

Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.

Salusu, J. 2010. Pengambilan Keputusan Sitrategik Jakarta: Grasindo.Siagian Sondang

Sedarmayanti, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, edisi I, Refika Aditama,

Bandung.

Sters, RM. 2010. Strategic Management. Singapore: McGraw Hill Book Company.

Sters, R.M. 2011. Motivation and Work Behavior. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc.

Sudjana. 2011. Metode Statistik. Bandung Tarsito

Timpe, A Dale. 2012. Kinerja. Terjemahan Sofyan Cikmat Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Asri Media.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09