DETERMINATION OF WORK AUTONOMY, ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE DETERMINATION OF COMPETENCE, COMMUNICATION AND EDUCATION WITH ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS AS VARIABLES MEDIATOR ON THE PERFORMANCE OF AGENCY OFFICERS TAX MANAGEMENT AND RETRIBUTION TANJUNG PINANG AREA

Authors

  • Rieo Triozal Anugrah Putra Batam University
  • Indrayani Indrayani Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/jzm.v10i3.582

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 40. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely competence, communication, education, organizational commitment and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.016 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.037 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.038 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.014 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.032 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.001 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.009 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Rieo Triozal Anugrah Putra, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

Indrayani Indrayani, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Arikunto Suharsimi. 2011. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Azwar Saifuddin. 2010. Reliabelitas dan Validitas seri Pengukuran Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Sigma Alfha.

Buhler, Patricia, 2010, Alpha Teach Yourself Management Skills, EdisiPertama, diterjemahkan oleh Sugeng Haryanto, SukonoMukidi, dan M. Rudi Atmoko, Jakarta: Prenada.

Davis, Keith., 2011. Fundamental Organization Behavior, DiterjemahkanAgus Dharma, Jakarta: Erlangga

Dessler, Gary., 2011, Manajemen Sumbe – day aManusia, Jakarta: Prenhallindo

Cohran. 2010. Teknik Penarikan Sampel. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Fattah, Nanang. 2015. Landasan Manajemen Pendidikan, bandung ; PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Gibson, James L., Invancevich, John M., dan Donnelly, Jame H. Jr., 2008. Organisasi, alih bahasa Ir. Nunuk Ardiani, MM. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Handoko, T Hani, 2011. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM.

Hamzah, 2012. Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya :Analisis Di Bidang Pendidikan. Cetaan Ketiga. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Handoko, Hani., 2010.Manajemen, BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Handoko, T Hani, 2010. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM.

Maryoto, Susilo, 2013, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM.

Ridwan. (2011). Metode & Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Edisi I. Alfabeta. Bandung

Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.

Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA

Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.

Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.

Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.

Sedarmayanti, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, edisi I, Refika Aditama,Bandung.

Siagian, P Sondang, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bumi Aksara,

Jakarta.

Salusu, J. 2015. Pengambilan Keputusan Sitrategik Jakarta: Grasindo.

Sudjana. 2011. Metode Statistik. Bandung Tarsito

Timpe, A Dale. 2010. Kinerja. Terjemahan Sofyan Cikmat Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Asri Media.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09