DETERMINATION OF AUTONOMY OF WORK, WORK FACILITIES AND DISCIPLINE OF WORK WITH WORK MOTIVATION AS INTERVENING VARIABLES TO PERFORMANCE EMPLOYEE OF PROVINCIAL HEALTH SERVICE RIAU ISLANDS

Authors

  • Sukaesih Sukaesih Department of Management, 2Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University
  • Jemmy Rumengan Department of Management, 2Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University
  • Angelina Eleonora Rumengan Department of Management, Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/jzm.v9i2.260

Keywords:

Work Autonomy, Work Facilities, Work Discipline, Work Motivation, Performance

Abstract

In this study, researchers used respondents' data, such as gender, age and duration of work of respondents to be able to provide information about the characteristics of respondents. Where from the questionnaire questionnaire distributed as many as 70 respondents using census techniques.Data analysis with parametric and non parametric statistics using SEM-PLS (Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square) regarding research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, and discussion of the results of hypothesis testing and Path Path Analysis. This study uses path analysis (path analysis) to test the pattern of relationships that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables on other variables, both direct influence and indirect influence.The results of the study are as follows: The effect of the X3 variable on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.004 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 and X4 is significant. The effect of the X3 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0,000> 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X3 on Y is significant. The effect of the X4 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0.006> 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X4 on Y is significant. The influence of X1 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.007 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to X4 is significant. The effect of X1 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.009> 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 and Y is significant. The effect of the X2 variable on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.005 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X2 on X4 is significant. The effect of the X2 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0.005 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X2 on Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Sukaesih Sukaesih, Department of Management, 2Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University

Department of Management, Department of AccountingFaculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia

Jemmy Rumengan, Department of Management, 2Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University

1Department of Management, 2Department of AccountingFaculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia

Angelina Eleonora Rumengan, Department of Management, Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University

Department of Management, Department of AccountingFaculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia

References

Colcuitt, Jason A. Levinne and Wesson. 2009. Organizational Behavior. Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. New York : McGraw-Hill Companies

Darwito (2009).Analisis Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan.Tesis. Semarang: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Desianty, S., 2010, “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Pada PT Pos Indonesia (PERSERO) Semarangâ€.Jurnal Studi Manajemen & Organisasi.Vol 2. No. 1,Januari, h. 69-84.

Dharma, Surya, 209. Manajemen Kinerja, Falsafah Teori dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Handoko, TH. 2010. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia.Yogjakarta : BPFE.

Haryani, 2012. â€Analisis Pengaruh Komunikasi, Motivasi, dan Kepemimpinan terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan PT. Arisamandiri Pratamaâ€. Semarang: STIE Dharma Putra.

Hunsaker, Philip L. & Anthony J. Alessandra, 2005. Seni Komunikasi Bagi Para Pemimpin. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Khaddafi Muammar, Wahyuddin, heikal Mohd, falahuddin and maulida Rahmatul (2018), "Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanism, Independence and Management of Earnings Integrity of Financial Statements" Journal Quality Access to Success, Vol. 19, No. 164/June 2018.

Khaddafi Muammar, Raza Hendra, Heikal Mohd (2015), "Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Budget Adequacy On Individual Performance With Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable" International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. III, Issue 2, Feb 2015.

Luthans, Fred, 2009. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Sepuluh, Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu, 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mas’ud, Fuad, 2008, “Survai Diagnosis Organisational,†Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Newstrom, John W. 2009. Organizational Behavior.Human Behavior at Work. NY:McGraw- Hill Companies.

Pace, R. Wayne dan Don F. Faules, 2009.Komunikasi Organisasi, Strategi Meningkatkan Kinerja Perusahaan. Editor: Dedy Mulyana. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pamungkas Davit Imang, Ghazali Imam, Ahmad Tarmizi and Khaddafi Muammar (2018), "Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Preventing Accounting Fraud: A Study of Fraud Pentagon Model", Journal of Applied Economic Sciences Volume XIII, Issue 2 (56), Spring 2018.

Riduwan, 2008.Metode & Teknik Menyusun Tesis.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rivai, Veithzal, 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan, Dari Teori ke Praktik.Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Robbins, Stephen P., 2010. Prinsip-prinsip Perilaku Organisasi.Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Robbins, Stephen P. dan Mary Coulter (2011).Management, Ninth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Rostina, F. Cut. 2011. â€Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Kemampuan Berkomunikasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di PT. Aquana Candra Binjaiâ€. Kultura, Vol. 12, No.1, Juni 2011, h. 2-11

Rumengan, Jemmy. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian dengan SPSS. Edisi Kedua. Batam: Uniba Press.

Soeprinhanto, John, 2010. Penilaian Kinerja dan Pengembangan Karyawan, Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta: BPFE, h. 12-27.

Suharto & Budhi Cahyono, 2011, “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Sumber DayaManusia di Sekretariat DPRD Propinsi Jawa Tengahâ€. JRBI Vol.1no.1, Jan, h. 13-30.

Tjiptono, F. & Anastasia Diana (2009), Total Quality Management. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI, h. 151-174.

Widodo, 2008.Cerdik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Yayasan Kelopak.

Yukl, Gary, 2008. Kepemimpinan Dalam Organisasi: Leadership in Organization 3e. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenhalindo.

Yuwalliatin, Sitty, 2009, “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Motivasi, dan Komitmen Terhadap Kinerja Serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keunggulan Kompetitif Dosen Unissula Semarang†. EKOBIS Vol. 7No. 2, Juni, h. 241-256.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles