DETERMINATION OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, SELF EFFICACY AND WORK CULTURE WITH WORK SATISFACTION AS INTERVENING VARIABLES ON EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION OF RIAU ISLANDS PROVINCE HEALTH

Authors

  • Suci Suliyana Department of Management, Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University
  • Jemmy Rumengan Department of Management, Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University
  • Angelina Eleonora Rumengan Department of Management, 2Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/jzm.v9i2.259

Keywords:

Emotional Intelligence, Self Efficacy, Work Culture, Job Satisfaction, Work Motivation

Abstract

In this study, researchers used respondents' data, such as gender, age and duration of work of respondents to be able to provide information about the characteristics of respondents. Where from the questionnaire questionnaire distributed as many as 70 respondents using census techniques. Data analysis with parametric and non parametric statistics using SEM-PLS (Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square) regarding research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, and discussion of the results of hypothesis testing and Path Path Analysis. This study uses path analysis (path analysis) to test the pattern of relationships that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables on other variables, both direct influence and indirect influence.The results of the study are as follows: The effect of the X3 variable on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.005 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 and X4 is significant. The effect of the X3 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0,000> 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X3 on Y is significant. The effect of the X4 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0.009> 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 on Y is significant. The effect of X1 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.024 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to X4 is significant. The effect of X1 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.006> 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 and Y is significant. The effect of the X2 variable on X4 has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0,05, so it can be stated that the effect between X2 on X4 is significant. The effect of X2 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.009 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X2 on Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Suci Suliyana, Department of Management, Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University

Department of Management, Department of AccountingFaculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia

Jemmy Rumengan, Department of Management, Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University

Department of Management, Department of AccountingFaculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia

Angelina Eleonora Rumengan, Department of Management, 2Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics, Batam University

Department of Management, Department of AccountingFaculty of Economics, Batam University, Indonesia

References

Adebayo, Sulaiman Olanrewaju ; Ogunsina, S.O. (2011). "Influence of Supervisory Behaviour and Job Stress on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention of Police Personnel in Ekiti State".Journal of Management and Strategy, Vol. 2, No. 3.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2009. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bandura, A (2010). The Relative Efficacy of Desensitization and Modelling Approaches for Inducing Behavior.Affective and Attitudinal Changes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol.121

Birky, Shelton and Headly. 2010. An Administrator ‘s Challenge: Encouraging teachers to be leaders.NASSP Bulletin, Vol. 90 p. 87.National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Boloz, Sigmund and Forter Carl. 2009. A Guide to Effective Leadership for The Reservation Administrator. Journal of Amirican Indian Education, Vol 19 p. 1. Diambil dari: http//jaie.asu.edu/v 19/V19S2res.html

Davis, Keith &Newstrom, John W. 2011.Perilaku dalam Organisasi. Penerjemah Agus Dhanna, Edisi kedua. Jilid I. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Daniel, Yvette. 2010. Principal Leadrship in New Teacher Induction: Becominmg Agent of Change. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, Vol 3 p. 3

Eliason, Stephen L. (2011) "Factors influencing job satisfaction among state conservation officers", Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, Vol. 29 Iss: 1.

Ghazanfar, Faheem; Chuanmin, Shuai; Khan, Muhammad Mahroof; Bashir, Mohsin (2011)."A Study of Relationship between Satisfaction with Compensation and Work Motivation".International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2 No. 1.

Handoko, T. Hani (2009). Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Liberty.

Hasibuan, Malayu S. P. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta :Bumi Aksara.

Hoy and Miskel. 2009. Educational Administration. Theory, Research and Practice.

Khaddafi Muammar, Wahyuddin, heikal Mohd, falahuddin and maulida Rahmatul (2018), "Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanism, Independence and Management of Earnings Integrity of Financial Statements" Journal Quality Access to Success, Vol. 19, No. 164/June 2018.

Khaddafi Muammar, Raza Hendra, Heikal Mohd (2015), "Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Budget Adequacy On Individual Performance With Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable" International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. III, Issue 2, Feb 2015.

Kim Yunki. (2009). “The Determinants of Public Officials' Job Satisfaction - The Case of Korean Public Officials In The Cadastral Administrationâ€. New Technology For A New Century International Conference FIG Working Week, Seoul Korea 6-11 May 2001, Session 12-Business Practices.

Mantja, Willem. 2009. Manajemen Pendidikan dan Supervisi Pendidikan. Kumpulan Karya Tulis Terpublikasi. Malang : Wineka Media.

Manzoni, Patrik (2010). "Violence Between the Police and the Public: Influences of Work-Related Stress, Job Satisfaction, Burnout, and Situational Factors". Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 33 No. 5 .

Mathis, Robert L. Dan Jackson, John H. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Muhammad, Ami. 2011. Komunikasi Organisasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nalla, Mahesh K.; Rydberg, Jason; Meško, Gorazd (2011). "Organizational factors, environmental climate, and job satisfaction among police in Slovenia". European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 8 No. 2.

Pamungkas Davit Imang, Ghazali Imam, Ahmad Tarmizi and Khaddafi Muammar (2018), "Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Preventing Accounting Fraud: A Study of Fraud Pentagon Model", Journal of Applied Economic Sciences Volume XIII, Issue 2 (56), Spring 2018.

Rousseau. 2009. Assessing Organizational Climite and Culture. The Journal of School Leadership, p.2. Diambil dari: http://cnx.org/content/m13465/latest

Siagiaan, Sondang P. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Siagiaan, Sondang P. 2009. Teori dan Praktek Semangat kerja. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sudjana dan Ibrahim. 2012. Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sugiyono. 2008. Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfebeta.

Weiner, B (2010). History of motiational research.Journal of Educational Psychologyp.616. Diambil dari http: //pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=11

Yukl, Gary. 2012. Semangat kerja dalam Organisasi. Alih Bahasa Budi Suprianto. Jakarta: Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles