DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES, WORK FACILITIES, WORK DISCIPLINE WITH MOTIVATION AS VARIABLE MEDIATOR TO THE CENTRAL EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE DATA AND SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION BP BATAM

Penulis

  • Rahmat Ikraldo Busyra Batam University
  • Irwansyah Irwansyah Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/jzm.v10i3.577

Abstrak

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 48. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely responsibility, work facilities, work discipline, work motivation and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The influence of the variable X3 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 on X4 is significant. The effect of the X3 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0,005 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 on Y is significant. The influence of the variable X4 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.008 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X4 on Y is significant. The influence of variable X1 to X4 has a P-Values value of 0.039 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X1 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.017 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 on Y is significant. The influence of variable X2 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.006 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence of X2 on X4 is significant. The influence of the variable X2 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.008 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X2 on Y is significant.

Biografi Penulis

Rahmat Ikraldo Busyra, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

Irwansyah Irwansyah, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

Referensi

Colcuitt, Jason A. Levinne and Wesson. 2011. Organizational Behavior. Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. New York : McGraw-Hill Companies

Dharma, Surya, 2011. Manajemen Kinerja, Falsafah Teori dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Haryani, 2012. â€Analisis Pengaruh Komunikasi, Motivasi, dan Kepemimpinan terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja

Karyawan PT. Arisamandiri Pratamaâ€. Semarang: STIE Dharma Putra.

Hunsaker, Philip L. & Anthony J. Alessandra, 2010. Seni Komunikasi Bagi Para Pemimpin. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Luthans, Fred, 2011. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Sepuluh, Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu, 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Newstrom, John W. 2019. Organizational Behavior. Human Behavior at Work. NY:McGraw- Hill Companies.

Pace, R. Wayne dan Don F. Faules, 2011. Komunikasi Organisasi, Strategi Meningkatkan Kinerja Perusahaan. Editor: Dedy Mulyana. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rostina, F. Cut. 2011. â€Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Kemampuan Berkomunikasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di PT. Aquana Candra Binjaiâ€.

Kultura, Vol. 12, No.1, Juni 2011, h. 2-11

Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.

Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA

Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.

Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.

Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.

Soeprinhanto, John, 2010. Penilaian Kinerja dan Pengembangan Karyawan, Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta: BPFE, h. 12-27.

Suharto & Budhi Cahyono, 2011, “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Sumber DayaManusia di Sekretariat DPRD Propinsi Jawa Tengahâ€. JRBI Vol.1no.1, Jan, h. 13-30.

Tjiptono, F. & Anastasia Diana (2011), Total Quality Management. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI, h. 151-174.

Yuwalliatin, Sitty, 2011, “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Motivasi, dan Komitmen Terhadap Kinerja Serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keunggulan Kompetitif Dosen Unissula Semarang†. EKOBIS Vol. 7No. 2, Juni, h. 241-256.

Diterbitkan

2021-05-09