DETERMINASI PERENCANAAN, PENGKOORDINASIAN DAN PENGAWASAN TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PT. PETEKA KARYA TIRTA BATAM

Penulis

  • Reni Angriani Department of Management, Faculty of Economic Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Sri Langgeng Ratnasari Department of Management, Faculty of Economic Universitas Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/jzm.v7i2.58

Abstrak

Competition among companies in the era of globalization increasingly sharp, so that the human resources required to continually able to develop themselves proactively. Every company, whether in the form of state companies or private companies must have an organization and its organizational structure, where lines of authority evident in the organizational structure. The organizational structure in PT. Peteka Karya Tirta Batam shaped line organization, in which the visible unity of commands or command, the lines of authority and responsibility for running vertically, which means the authority of superiors to subordinates down immediately and responsibility of subordinates to superiors. This study focuses on the determination of planning, coordinating and monitoring the performance of employees of PT. Peteka Karya Tirta Batam is located in Batam because here the center of managerial activities performed. The purpose of this study is first to determine the planning is determined partially on the performance of employees. The second to determine the coordination is determined partially on the performance of employees. Third to know surveillance is determined partially on the performance of employees. To four to determine the planning, coordination and supervision is determined simultaneously on the performance of employees of PT. Peteka Karya Tirta Batam. From hasi research and discussion on the results of a comparative analysis of the value of t arithmetic and t table, it can be concluded that the planning variables have the determination to employees performance. Variable coordination has the determination to employees performance. Variable supervision had a determination to employees performance. The results were obtained F count is 82.31 with Sig 0,000 < α 0,05 and the coefficient of determination or R2 of 0.765 or 76.5%. 76.5% means that the performance of the affected research planning, coordination and supervision. While the remaining 23.5% is influenced by other variables that are not the focus of this study. Thus these data show that a significant means There determination of planning, coordination and supervision simultaneously on employee performance.

Biografi Penulis

Reni Angriani, Department of Management, Faculty of Economic Universitas Batam, Indonesia

Department of Management, Faculty of Economic Universitas Batam, Indonesia

Sri Langgeng Ratnasari, Department of Management, Faculty of Economic Universitas Batam, Indonesia

Department of Management, Faculty of Economic Universitas Batam, Indonesia

Referensi

A.A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Abdul, Majid. 2009. Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda karya

Agus, Dharma. 2006. Manajemen Supervisi. Jakarta : Rajawali pers

Adisasmita, Rahardjo, 2011, Pengelolaan Pendapatan dan Anggaran Daerah, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta

.

Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta : PT. Rineke Cipta.

Dessler. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta. Indeks.

Erly Suandy, 2006. Perencanaan Pajak, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Freddy Rangkuti. 2011. Riset Pemasaran. Cetakan ke 10. Jakarta : Percetakan PT. Gramedia

Ghozali, Imam. 2006. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan program SPSS, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Hilton, Ronald W. 2008. Managerial Accounting : Creating Value A Dynamic Business Environment, 7thEdition, McGraw Hill, New York.

Handoko, T. Hani. 2009. Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE- YOGYAKARTA.

J Supranto, Statistik Untuk Pemimpin Berwawasan Global, Penerbit Salemba Empat, JAKARTA 2007.

Melayu, S.P. Hasibuan, 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Cetakan 9. PT. Bumi Aksara.

Mathis Robert L. dan Jackson John. H. 2006, Human Resource Management, alih bahasa. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Muhammad Nisfiannoor,2009, Pedekatan Statistika Modren untuk ilmu sosial, penerbit salemba humanika, Jakarta.

Nawawi, H (2008), Perencanaan Sumber Daya Manusia : Untuk Bisnis yang Kompetitif, Penerbit Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Prawirosentono, Suryadi. 2008. Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Riduwan, 2008. Metode dan teknik menyusun Tesis. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rumengan, Jemmy. 2010. Metode Penelitian Dengan SPSS. Batam: Uniba Press

Sofyan safri, 2009, sistem pengawasan manajemen manajemen control system) , Jakarta: pustaka quantum,

Siswanto. 2009. Pengantar Manajemen. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Suandy, Erly. 2011. Hukum Pajak, Edisi 5, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sugiyono, 2010. Metode Penelitian

Kuantitatif Kualitatif & RND.Bandung

Terry, George R. 2006. Asas-asas

Menejemen. Alumni.

Bandung: P.T

Diterbitkan

2019-03-25

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles