DETERMINATION OF WORK DISCIPLINE, WORKING ENVIRONMENT, WORKING FACILITIES WITH JOB SATISFACTION AS A VARIABLE OF MEDIATOR ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS PLANNING AGENCY, RESEARCH AND PROVINCIAL DEVELOPMENT RIAU ISLANDS PROVINCE

Authors

  • Dodi Susetio Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i1.559

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 74. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely the discipline, work environment, work facilities, job satisfaction and the commitment of the employee's organization. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.007 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.001 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.008 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.008 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.001 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. 1. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.022 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X2 against Y is significant.

Author Biography

Dodi Susetio, Batam University

Student of the Postgraduate Masters Program in Management

References

Colcuitt, Jason A. Levinne and Wesson. 2011. Organizational Behavior. Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. New York : McGraw-Hill Companies

Darwito (2011). Analisis Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan. Tesis. Semarang: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Desianty, S., 2010, “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Pada PT Pos Indonesia (PERSERO) Semarangâ€. Jurnal Studi Manajemen & Organisasi. Vol 2. No. 1,Januari, h. 69-84.

Dharma, Surya, 2001. Manajemen Kinerja, Falsafah Teori dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Handoko, TH. 2010. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogjakarta : BPFE.

Haryani, 2012. â€Analisis Pengaruh Komunikasi, Motivasi, dan Kepemimpinan terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan PT. Arisamandiri Pratamaâ€. Semarang: STIE Dharma Putra.

Hunsaker, Philip L. & Anthony J. Alessandra, 2010. Seni Komunikasi Bagi Para Pemimpin. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Luthans, Fred, 2011. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Sepuluh, Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu, 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mas’ud, Fuad, 2010, “Survai Diagnosis Organisational,†Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Newstrom, John W. 2011. Organizational Behavior. Human Behavior at Work. NY:McGraw- Hill Companies.

Riduwan, 2010. Metode & Teknik Menyusun Tesis. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rivai, Veithzal, 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan, Dari Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Robbins, Stephen P., 2010. Prinsip-prinsip Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Robbins, Stephen P. dan Mary Coulter (2011). Management, Ninth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Rostina, F. Cut. 2011. â€Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Kemampuan Berkomunikasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di PT. Aquana Candra Binjaiâ€. Kultura, Vol. 12, No.1, Juni 2011, h. 2-11

Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.

Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA

Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.

Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.

Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.

Soeprinhanto, John, 2010. Penilaian Kinerja dan Pengembangan Karyawan, Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta: BPFE, h. 12-27.

Suharto & Budhi Cahyono, 2011, “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Sumber DayaManusia di Sekretariat DPRD Propinsi Jawa Tengahâ€. JRBI Vol.1no.1, Jan, h. 13-30.

Tjiptono, F. & Anastasia Diana (2011), Total Quality Management. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI, h. 151-174.

Widodo, 2010. Cerdik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Yayasan Kelopak.

Yukl, Gary, 2010. Kepemimpinan Dalam Organisasi: Leadership in Organization 3e. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenhalindo.

Yuwalliatin, Sitty, 2011, “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Motivasi, dan Komitmen Terhadap Kinerja Serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keunggulan Kompetitif Dosen Unissula Semarang†. EKOBIS Vol. 7No. 2, Juni, h. 241-256.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09