DETERMINATION OF SELF EFFICACY, WORK DISCIPLINE, WORKING ENVIRONMENT TOWARDS MOTIVATION AS A VARIABLE OF MEDIATOR TO THE PERFORMANCE OF HEALTH SERVICE OFFICERS RIAU ISLANDS PROVINCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i1.560Abstract
In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 104. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely self efficacy, disipin work, working environment, work motivation and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against the X4 has a P-Values value of 0.008 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 against X4 is significant. The influence of X3 variables against Y has a P-Values value of 0.000 > 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.008 > 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.018 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.047 > 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.009 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.References
Aji, BB. 2010. Analisis Dampak Dari Locus Of Control Pada Tekanan Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja, Dan Kinerja Auditor Internal. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Semarang: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
Alwisol. (2011). Psikologi Kepribadian. Malang: UMM Press
Bandura, A. (2011). Self-Efficacy The Exercise of Control. New York : W.H. Freeman and Company.
Dessler, Gary. 2010. Human Resources Management. Jakarta: PT. Indeks
Hani. T. Handoko. (2011). Mengukur Kepuasan Kerja. Jakarta: Erlangga. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ismail, Rahmah and Syahida Zainal Abidin. 2010. Impact of Workers’ Competence on their performance in the Malaysian Private Service Sector. Business and Economic Horizond Vol. 2 Issue 2 p. 25-36
Janjua, Saquib Yusaf. 2012. The Competence Classification Framework A Classification Model For Employee Development. Journal of Contemporary Research in Business Vol. 4(1) p.396-404
John M. Ivancevich and Michael T. Matteson, Organizational Behavior and Management, (New York: McGraw-Hill,2010),p.206.
John W. Newstrom and Keith Davis, Organizational Behavior, (New York:
McGraw-Hill, 2011),p.97.
Marlikan, Muchni. 2011. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Organisasi dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Koperasi Syariah. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Vol. 1 No. 01 hal. 57-64
Nurhidayah, S., & Hidayanti, N. 2012. Hubunganantara ketabahan dan locus ofcontrol external dengan kebermaknaan hidup pada istri yang bekerja dibagian sewing pada PT. Bosaeng Jaya Bantar Gebang Bekasi.
Jurnal FISIP: SOUL, ejournal-unisma.net Richard H. Axelrod, Term of Engagement: Changing The Way, We Change Organization, (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher, 2010),p.116.
Ridwan. (2011). Metode & Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Edisi I. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.
Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA
Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.
Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.
Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.
Salusu, J. 2010. Pengambilan Keputusan Sitrategik Jakarta: Grasindo.Siagian
Sondang P. 2011. Teori dan Praktik Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuskrip yang diserahkan penulis haruslah sebuah karya yang tidak melanggar hak cipta (copyright) yang ada. Naskah yang dimasukkan harus yang belum pernah diterbitkan dan tidak dikirimkan pada waktu yang bersamaan kepada penerbit lain. Hak cipta atas semua material termasuk yang berbentuk cetak, elektronik dan bentuk lainnya dipegang oleh Jurnal Akuntansi. Setelah manuskrip telah melewati proses penyuntingan substansi dan positif diterima, penulis mengirimkan berkas Pernyataan Hak Cipta b ke alamat redaksi Jurnal Zona Manejerial.
