DETERMINATION OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP, SELF EFFICACY AND WORK RESPONSIBILITIES WITH MOTIVATION AS VARIABLE OF MEDIATOR ON THE PERFORMANCE OF GENERAL BUREAU OFFICER OF PROVINCIAL SECRETARIAT OF RIAU ISLANDS USING SEM PLS

Authors

  • Endrie Djoko Satrio Batam University
  • Muammar Khaddafi Universitas Malikussaleh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i1.562

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 83. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely transformational leadership, self efficacy, job responsibilities, work motivation and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.008 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.017 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.008 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.012 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.046 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Endrie Djoko Satrio, Batam University

Student of the Postgraduate Masters Program in Management

Muammar Khaddafi, Universitas Malikussaleh

Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business

References

Dessler, Gary. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi Bahasa Indonesia Jilid 2. Jakarta: Prenhallindo.

Echols JM., & Shadilly H., 2010, Kamus Inggris Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Gramedia.

Gomes, Faustino Cardoso. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogjakarta: Andi Offset.

Guritno, Bambang dan Waridin. 2010. Pengaruh Persepsi Karyawan Mengenai Perilaku Kepemimpinan, Kepuasan Kerja dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja. JRBI, Vol.1 No. 1, pp.63-74

Hani Handoko. 2011. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumberdaya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Haryono. 2011. Pengaruh Karakteristik Pekerjaan Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dengan Mediasi Motivasi Kerja (Studi Pada Pegawai Badan Pelaksana Penyuluhan Pertanian, Perikanan dan Kehutanan Kabupaten Batang. Tesis Tidak Dipublikasikan, Program Pascasarjana Magister Manajemen, Universitas Stikubank Semarang.

Lies Indriyani. 2011. Analisis Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Perawat Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Ekonomi – Manajemen – Akuntansi, No. 26, Th. XVI, pp. 117-127.

Mahmudi, 2011. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogjakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

Masrukin dan Waridin. 2010. Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja, Budaya Organisasi dan Kepemimpinan terhadap Kinerja Pegawai, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Vol. 7 (2), Juni : 197-209.

Rita Swietenia. 2011. Analisis Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Kompensasi dan Karakteristik Pekerjaan Terhadap Disiplin Kerja Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai (Studi Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kota Semarang). Jurnal Ekonomi – Manajemen – Akuntansi, No. 26, Th. XVI, pp. 96-116.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2010. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta : PT Indeks.

Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.

Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA

Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.

Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.

Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.

Sastrohadiwiryo, Bejo Siswanto. 2013. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Pendekatan Administrative dan Operasional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Simamora, Henry. 2014. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: SIE YKPN.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09