DETERMINATION OF EDUCATION, TRAINING AND COMPETENCE WITH THE MOTIVATION OF WORKING AS A VARIABLE OF THE MEDIATOR ON THE PERFORMANCE OF MARINE SERVICE OFFICERS AND FISHERIES OF RIAU ISLANDS PROVINCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i1.566Abstract
In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 93. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely education, training, competence, work motivation and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.015 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.006 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.010 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.008 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.003 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.011 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.References
A A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, 2011, Evaluasi Kerja SDM, Refika Aditama, Bandung
Agus Dwi Atmoko, Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Pendidikan dan Pelatihan
Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai, 2011
Arep, Ishak dan Tanjung, Hendri 2011, Managemen Motivasi, Cetakan Kedua, Penerbit Grasindo, Jakarta
Gogy Bara Kharisma (2013), Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Koperasi Serba Usaha, Stya Usaha di Kabupaten Jepara. Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Handoko, Hani T, Dr.MBA dan Reksohadiprojo Sukanto, Dr.M.Com1996, Organisasi Perusahaan, Edisi kedua Yogyakarta : BPFE
Jagarin Pane dan Sih Darmi Astuti, Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan Tranformaional dan Kompensasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai.
Kreitner Robert Kinchi Angelo, 2010, Perilaku Organisasi, Terjemahan Erly Suandy, Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Kistoyo (2011), Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Komunikasi, Kinerja, Motivasi Fisisk terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Kantor Dinas Kependidikan Kabupaten Pekalongan, Fasca Sarjana, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Luthans, F. 2011, Organizational Behavior. New York; McGraw-hill.
Musriha (2013), Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Pelatihan, Kompensasi dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Departemen Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Kabupatem Probolinggo, Pasca Srjana,Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya.
Marihot Manullang, 2012, Managemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Medan.
Nurlaila, 2010, Managemen Sumber Daya Manusia I, Penerbit LepKhair
Rivai, Vethzal & Basri, 2010, Performace Appraisal;Sistem yang tepat untuk Menilai Kinerja Pegawai dan Meningkatkan Daya Sing Perusahaan. Jakarta;PT.RajaGrafindo Persada
Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.
Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA
Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.
Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.
Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.
Robbins, Stephen P. (2011). Organization Behavior. 11th ed. Prentice Hall. New Jersey
Schein, Edgar H (2011), The Corporate Culture Survival Guide. Jossey-Bass Publ. Sn Fransisco.
Sudaryono, 2011, Aplikasi Analisys (Analisys Path) Berdasarkan urutan variable dalam penelitian. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Vol 17, No. 4, 2011
Suharto dan Budhi Cahyono (2012), Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi kerja Terhadap Kinerja Sumberdaya Manusia
Sugiono, 2011, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung Alfabeta
Susandi Priharyanto (2012), Analisis Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk Regional IV Jawa Tengah, Daerah Instimewa Yogyakarta, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Dipenogoro Semarang.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuskrip yang diserahkan penulis haruslah sebuah karya yang tidak melanggar hak cipta (copyright) yang ada. Naskah yang dimasukkan harus yang belum pernah diterbitkan dan tidak dikirimkan pada waktu yang bersamaan kepada penerbit lain. Hak cipta atas semua material termasuk yang berbentuk cetak, elektronik dan bentuk lainnya dipegang oleh Jurnal Akuntansi. Setelah manuskrip telah melewati proses penyuntingan substansi dan positif diterima, penulis mengirimkan berkas Pernyataan Hak Cipta b ke alamat redaksi Jurnal Zona Manejerial.
