DETERMINATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, COMPETENCE, WORKING ENVIRONMENT WITH JOB SATISFACTION AS A VARIABLE OF MEDIATOR ON THE PERFORMANCE OF HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES THE RIAU ISLANDS PROVINCE

Authors

  • Pathurahman Pathurahman Batam University
  • Adnan Suhardis Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i2.628

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 200. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely organizational culture, competence, work environment, job satisfaction and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.003 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.002 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Pathurahman Pathurahman, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

Adnan Suhardis, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Arianto, D. A. (2013). Pengaruh Kedisiplinan, Lingkungan Kerja dan Budaya Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Tenaga Pengajar. Jurnal Economia.

AA. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.

Halim, A. 2011. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai (studi pada dinas informasi komunikasi dan pengolahan data elektronik kota Medan). [Skripsi]. Medan. Departemen Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Sumatera Utara. 140 hal.

Handoko, T. Hani. (2011). Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Cetakan Kesebelas, PT. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Humairoh, & Wardoyo. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Employee Engagement Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Kasus: Perusahaan Jasa Layanan Pelabuhan). jurnal Ultima Management.

Khaddafi Muammar, Wahyuddin, heikal Mohd, falahuddin and maulida Rahmatul (2018), "Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanism, Independence and Management of Earnings Integrity of Financial Statements" Journal Quality Access to Success, Vol. 19, No. 164/June 2018.

Khaddafi Muammar, Raza Hendra, Heikal Mohd (2015), "Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Budget Adequacy On Individual Performance With Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable" International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. III, Issue 2, Feb 2015

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior, Twelfth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Meyer, J. P., dan Allen, N. J. (2012), Commitment in The Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. London: Sage Publication Inc.

Mondy, R. W. (2016). Human Resource Management. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Muhammad, S. R., Adolfina, & Lumintang, G. (2016). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja, Kompensasi Dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Dinas Pendapatan Daerah Kota Manado. Jurnal EMBA.

Nuridin, & Pratiwi, I. (2016). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT Kubik Madani. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Krisnadwipayana.

Rivai, Veithzal (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.

Metodologi Penelitian dengan SPSS. Edisi Kedua. Batam: Uniba Press.

Ridwan. (2011). Metode & Teknik

Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Edisi I Alfabeta. Bandung

Rumengan Muhammad Tammy Ikbal, Rumengan Jemmy, Manjang Yunazar

(2019), "Work Spirit Determination, Work Responsibility And Work Facilities With Work Motivation As Intervening Variables To Performance Of University Employees Batam Using SEM-PLS (Partial Least Square)" Zona Manajerial Vol: 9 No: 1, 2019.

Rumengan Muhammad Tommy Arby, Rumengan Jemmy, Manjang Yunazar (2019), "Work Discipline Determination, Competence And Work Environment With Work Satisfaction As Variables Intervening On Organizational Commitments Pegawai Batam University With Using SEM-PLS (Partial Least Square)", Zona Manajerial Vol: 9 No: 1, 2019

Sedarmayanti, 2010, Manajemen Sumber

Daya Manusia, edisi I, Refika Aditama,Bandung.

Sedarmayanti (2011). Sumber Daya

Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja.Bandung : Mandar Maju.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-21