THE DETERMINATION OF LOCUS OF CONTROL, WORK DISCIPLINE, WORKING ENVIRONMENT WITH WORK SATISFACTION AS A VARIABLE MEDIATOR ON THE WORK MOTIVATION OF INSPECTORATE OFFICERS RIAU ISLANDS PROVINCE

Authors

  • Dwi Murnianty Batam University
  • Muammar Khaddafi Universitas Malikussaleh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i1.561

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 69. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely locus of control, work discipline, work environment, job satisfaction and employee motivation. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.007 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.005 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.041 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.006 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.004 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.007 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Dwi Murnianty, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

Muammar Khaddafi, Universitas Malikussaleh

Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business

References

Dharma, Surya (2010). Manajemen Prestasi Kerja: Edisi Pertama: Rajawali, Jakarta.

Davis, Keith & John W Newstrom, (2012). Perilaku Dalam Organisasi, edisi bahasa Indonesia, Erlangga, Jakarta.

Edy Sutrisno. 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi ke- 3. Jakarta Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Fita, Sari, 2014, Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja, Self Efficacy dan Locus of Control terhadap Kinerja Karyawan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Gusti (2012), Pengaruh Kedisiplinan, Motivasi Kerja dan Persepsi guru Tentang Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah terhadap Kinerja Guru SMKN 1 Purworejo Pasca Sertifikasi, Jurnal Nominal Nomor 1, Vol, 1 No. 1 Fak.Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip

Hasibuan, Malayu, (2013). Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara

Harianta, Janata, (2012), “Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Di Kantor Kecamatan Teras Kabupaten Boyolaliâ€, Jurnal Transformasi Vol.XIV No 22 Tahun 2012

Hamedoglu MA, Kantor J and Gülay E. 2012. The effect of locus of control and culture on leader preferences. IOJES; 4(2): 319-324.

Kuswati, Rini. 2013. Analisis Pengaruh Locus Of Control Pada Kinerja Karyawan.Seminar Nasional. Surakarta

Lautania (2011), Pengaruh time budget pressure, locus of control dan perilaku difungsional audit terhadap kinerja auditor (Studi pada kantor Akuntan Publik Indonesia)

Masngudi, Noor Salim.M. (2012). Metode Penelitian Untuk Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, Jakarta, Rianda University Press

Matnis dan Jackson. 2011.Pengembangan Produksi dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada

Mangkunegara, AA AnwarPrabu.2010.Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. Bandung:Refika

Aditama.

Marwansyah, 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi Kedua. Bandung, Alfabeta

Mangkunegara, Prabu Azwar., AA, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, PT.Remaja Resdakarya, Bandung.

Moeheriono, 2010. Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi, Jakarta, Grafindo Persada

Nawawi, Hadari, 2010, Perencanaan SDM, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Nuraini.T, 2013, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta.

Noer dan Rihardjo (2007), Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Locus of Control Dan T Di Kebijakan Sector Public Terhadap Kinerja Aparat Pelayanan Public UP Pemda Bangkalan

Wahjosumidjo, 2010, Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada.

Wahyuni, Endang Sri. (2016), Pengaruh budaya organisasi, locus of control, stres kerja terhadap kinerja aparat pemerintah daerah dan kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel intervening (Studi empiris pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Bengkalis). Jurnal Manajemen, Vol. XX No. 02, pp. 189-206

Wiriani, Wayan, 2011. Efek Moderasi locus of control Pada Hubungan Pelatihan dan Kinerja Pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat di Kabupaten Badung, Jurnal Akuntansi. 1(2): h: 11-19

Winardi, J, 2011. Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi. Bandung: PT. Citra Adtya Bakti

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09