DETERMINATION OF THE WORK SPIRIT, LOCUS OF CONTROL AND WORK DISCIPLINE WITH THE COMMITMENT OF THE ORGANIZATION AS A VARIABLE MEDIATOR TO THE MOTIVATION OF WORK OFFICER DISPORA RIAU ISLANDS PROVINCE

Authors

  • Sulaiha Sulaiha Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i3.568

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of the respondent. The questionnaire was spread over 46. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely the spirit of work, locus of control, work discipline, organizational commitment, and employee motivation. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against the X4 has a P-Values value of 0.013 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 against X4 is significant. The influence of X3 variables against Y has a P-Values value of 0.012 > 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.006 > 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.010 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.006 > 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.005 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.048 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.

Author Biography

Sulaiha Sulaiha, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Aji, BB. 2010. Analisis Dampak Dari Locus Of Control Pada Tekanan Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja, Dan Kinerja Auditor Internal. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Semarang: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Bobbi Deporter dan Mike Henaki, Quantum Bisnis: Membiasakan Berbisnis Secara Etis dan Sehat, (Bandung: Kaifa,2009),pp.299-300.

Cambell. 2010. Exprimental and Quasi Exsprimental Design for Research. Chicago: Randnally.

Cohran. 2011. Teknik Penarikan Sampel. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Davis K. 2011. Prilaku dalam Organisasi. Terjemahan tim Erlangga. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Dessler, Gary. 2010. Human Resources Management. Jakarta: PT. Indeks

Hani. T. Handoko. (2011). Mengukur Kepuasan Kerja. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hasibuan, Malayu. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya manusia. Jakarta: PT Bumi. Aksara.

Hasibuan, Malayu. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan Ketujuh Belas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Ismail, Rahmah and Syahida Zainal Abidin. 2010. Impact of Workers’ Competence on their performance in the Malaysian Private Service Sector. Business and Economic Horizond Vol. 2 Issue 2 p. 25-36

Janjua, Saquib Yusaf. 2012. The Competence Classification Framework A Classification Model For Employee Development. Journal of Contemporary Research in Business Vol. 4(1) p.396-404

John M. Ivancevich and Michael T. Matteson, Organizational Behavior and Management, (New York: McGraw-Hill,2002),p.206.

John W. Newstrom and Keith Davis, Organizational Behavior, (New York:

McGraw-Hill, 2011),p.97.

Kuncoro, Mudrajat. 2011. Metode Riset untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi: Erlangga. Jakarta.

Sikap terhadap Program Pendidikan Inklusi Bagi Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus. Psikologika. Vol.4. No.2. H.42-47

Marlikan, Muchni. 2011. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Organisasi dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Koperasi Syariah. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Vol. 1 No. 01 hal. 57-64

Nurhidayah, S., & Hidayanti, N. 2012. Hubunganantara ketabahan dan locus ofcontrol external dengan kebermaknaan hidup pada istri yang bekerja dibagian sewing pada PT. Bosaeng Jaya Bantar Gebang Bekasi.

Jurnal FISIP: SOUL, ejournal-unisma.net Richard H. Axelrod, Term of Engagement: Changing The Way, We Change Organization, (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher, 2010),p.116.

Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.

Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA

Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.

Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.

Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.

Sedarmayanti, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, edisi I, Refika Aditama,

Bandung.

Sters, RM. 2010. Strategic Management. Singapore: McGraw Hill Book Company.

Sters, R.M. 2011. Motivation and Work Behavior. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc.

Sudjana. 2011. Metode Statistik. Bandung Tarsito

Thamrin Abdullah, Hubungan Motivasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja dan Kemampuan Manajerial atasan dengan Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai di Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Timpe, A Dale. 2012. Kinerja. Terjemahan Sofyan Cikmat Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Asri Media.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09