DETERMINATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, WORK FACILITIES, COMMUNICATION WITH WORK SATISFACTION AS MODERATOR VARIABLES TO PERFORMANCE OF HUMAS BUREAU, PROTOCOL AND CONNECTORS OF PROVINCE SECRETARIATRIAU ISLANDS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i3.569Abstract
In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 50. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely organizational culture, work facilities, communication, job satisfaction and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance.           The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.020 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.021 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.035 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.030 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.018 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.009 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.References
Dessler, Gary. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi Bahasa Indonesia Jilid 2. Jakarta: Prenhallindo.
Dessler, Gary. 2010. Human Resource Management 8th Edition. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Gibson, James L,2011, organizations behavior process, 12th edition, Mr Graw hill
Hadari Nawawi, 2011. Perencanaan Sumbe Daya Manusia. Cetakan 7.
Hasibuan M. (2010). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Handoko H. (2011) ; Manajemen Personalia Dan Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta, BFFE Yogyakarta.
Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.
Jakarta
Herman, Sofyandi. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : praha Ilmu.
Husein Umar. 2011. Riset Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Organisasi. Edisi 7. PT. Sun. Jakarta.
Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung
Manullang, Marihot, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, edisi I, BPFE Yogyakarta
Manulang, M. (2010). Manajemen Personalia. Cetakan 3. Gadjah Mada University press.
Mathis, Robert. L,2010, Human Resorce Manajemen, terjemahan editor angelia
Diana, manajemen Sumber Daya manusia, Edisi 10, Salemba 4 Jakarta
Mondy, R wayne, Noe, Robert M, 2011, Human Resorce Manajemen, 9th Edition, Pearson Educations International
Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart & Wright, 2011. Human Resources Management, Mc Graw Hill International Edition.
Noe, Raymond A., Hollenbeck, John R., (3erhart, B. & Wright, Patrick M. 2006. Human Resource Management: Gaining A Competitive Advantage. New York: McGraw Hill.
Netisminto A., (2010) Manajemen personalia, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta, Ghalatia Indonesia.
Priyatno, Duwi, 2011, 5 Jam belajar olah data dengan SPSS17, Andi Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Prabu Mangkunegara, Anwar, 2011, Evaluasi Kinerja, refika Aditama, Bandung
Ridwan. (2011). Metode & Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Edisi I. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Robbin, Stephen P & Judge, 2011. Organizational Behaviour, Twelfth Edition. Prentice Hall International, Inc
Rumengan Jemmy. 2010. Research Methodology with SPSS. BATAM: UNIBA Press.
Rumengan Jemmy / Satriawan, Bambang / Juliandi, Azuar / Irfan, (2011), Path Analysis with SPSS, Diktat lectures and training. BATAM: UNIBA
Rumengan Jemmy, Suhardis Adnan, Rumengan Tommy 2020. Health Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-623-7648-49-9.
Rumengan Jemmy, Juliandi Azuar, Khaddafi Muammar, Rumengan Eleonora Angelina 2019. Research Methods. Sefa Bumi Persada ISBN-978-602-0768-85-4.
Rumengan Jemmy, Khaddafi Muammar, Syarif Arman, Yanti Sri 2020. Research Methodology. Sefa Bumi Persada. ISBN-978-623-7648-57-4.
Siagian, P Sondang, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bumi Aksara,
Jakarta
Sedarmayanti, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, edisi I, Refika Aditama, Bandung
Simamora, Henry 2011. Manajemen Sumber daya manusia, Edisi III, STIE YKPN Jakarta
Syahril Efendi. 2010. Modul MSDM.
Syahril Efendi. 2011. Perencanaan SDM. Medan. Proffesional Pres.
Suyadi Prawirosentono, M.B.A. ( 2010), Kebijakan Kinerja Pegawai, BPFE
Yogyakarta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuskrip yang diserahkan penulis haruslah sebuah karya yang tidak melanggar hak cipta (copyright) yang ada. Naskah yang dimasukkan harus yang belum pernah diterbitkan dan tidak dikirimkan pada waktu yang bersamaan kepada penerbit lain. Hak cipta atas semua material termasuk yang berbentuk cetak, elektronik dan bentuk lainnya dipegang oleh Jurnal Akuntansi. Setelah manuskrip telah melewati proses penyuntingan substansi dan positif diterima, penulis mengirimkan berkas Pernyataan Hak Cipta b ke alamat redaksi Jurnal Zona Manejerial.