DETERMINATION OF ETHICS, WORK DISCIPLINE, WORK ENVIRONMENT WITH JOB SATISFACTION AS A VARIABLE MEDIATOR TO THE MOTIVATION OF WORK DISTRICT OFFICERS TANJUNG PINANG EAST

Authors

  • Suzana Suzana Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i3.570

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 77. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely ethics, work discipline, work environment, job satisfaction and employee motivation. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the variable X3 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.017 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 on X4 is significant. The effect of the X3 variable on Y has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 on Y is significant. The influence of the variable X4 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.046 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X4 on Y is significant. The influence of the variable X1 to X4 has a P-Values value of 0.046 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to X4 is significant. The influence of the variable X1 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.045 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 on Y is significant. The effect of variable X2 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.005 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X2 on X4 is significant. The influence of the variable X2 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.047 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X2 on Y is significant.

Author Biography

Suzana Suzana, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Byars, L.L., and L. W., Rue, 2011, Human Resources Management, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, hal. 275.

Duwi Priyatno, 2010. Paham Analisa Statistik Data Dengan SPSS, Penerbit Mediakom Krasak Timur Yogyakarta. Hal. 8

Guritno, Bambang dan Waridin. 2010. Pengaruh Persepsi Pegawai Mengenai Perilaku Kepemimpinan, Kepuasan Kerja Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja. JRBI. Vol 1. No 1. Hal: 63-74.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Koesmono H. Teman, 2011. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi terhadap Motivasi dan Kepuasan Kerja serta Kinerja Pegawai pada Sub. Sektor Industri Pengolahan Kayu Ekspor di Jawa Timur, Disertasi Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.

Lupiyodi Rambat, 2011. Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa, Edisi 2. Penerbit Salemba Empat, Jakarta

Luthans, F., 2010, Organizational Behavior, Mc Graw-Hill Book Co-Singapore, Singapura

Malayu S.P.Hasibuan, 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara

Nasution, 2011. Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah). Cetakan Kesepuluh. Penerbit CV Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

Nelson, D.L., and J.C., Quick, 2012, Organizatonal Behavior Foundations Realities and Challenges, Thompson South Western, United States of America, hal. 120.

Noe, R. A. , et all, 2011, Human Resources Management, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, hal. 436

Rianse Usman, Prof, Dr Ir. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Eknomomi (Teori dan Aplikasi.) Penerbit Alfabeta, Bandung

Sugiyono, Prof, Dr. 2020. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Cetakan Keempat. Penerbit Alfabeta, Bandung

Pack, S.M. dan B.W. Soetjipto, 2011. Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Organizational Support for NCAA Athletic Administrator, OhioLink ETD, 177.

Rahma, S., Suhandana, G.A., dan Suarni, Ni Kt. 2013, “Kontribusi Efektivitas

Kepemimpinan, Budaya Organisasi Dan Etos Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai Balai Diklat Keagamaan Denpasarâ€. e-Journal, Vol 4: 1-12.

Rivai, Veithzal. dan Mulyadi, Deddy. 2012, Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Robbins, S.P., and T.A., Judge, 2009, Organizational Behavior, Pearson Prentice Hall, United State Of America, New York, hal. 113

Rucky S A. 2010. Sistem Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Sarwono, S.W. 2011. Sumber Daya Manusia Kunci Sukses Organisasi, Jakarta, Lembaga Manajmen Universitas Indonesia.

Simanjuntak, 2012. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja, Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta

Suranto, AW. 2011. Komunikasi Perkantoran, Cetakan Pertama Media Wacana Jogyakarata.

Sumaryadi, I Nyoman, 2010. Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Otonom & Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Jakarta, Citra Utama.

Tjiptono Fandy Ph.D. 2011. Service, Quality & Satisfaction, Edisi 3. Penerbit CV Andi Offset, Yogyakarta

Tika H. Moh. Pabundu, 2010. Budaya Organisasi dan Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan, Cetak-an Pertama, PT. Bhumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09