DETERMINATION OF COMPETENCE, EDUCATION, SELF EFFICACY WITH THE SPIRIT OF WORK AS VARIABLE INTERVENING AGAINST EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE TANJUNG PINANG CITY EDUCATION OFFICE

Authors

  • Marsha Fajaryani Batam University
  • Jemmy Rumengan Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i2.606

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 42. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely competence, education, self efficacy, work spirit and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The influence of the variable X3 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.008 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 on X4 is significant. The influence of the variable X3 on X4 has a PValues value of 0,000 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 on X4 is significant. The influence of the variable X4 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.008 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X4 on Y is significant. The influence of the variable X1 to X4 has a P-Values value of 0.010 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X1 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.047 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 on Y is significant. The influence of the variable X2 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence of X2 on X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X2 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.007 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X2 on Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Marsha Fajaryani, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

Jemmy Rumengan, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Arikunto Suharsimi. 2011. Manajemen

Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Davis, Keith., 2011. Fundamental

Organization Behavior,

DiterjemahkanAgus Dharma,

Jakarta: Erlangga

Dessler, Gary., 2011, Manajemen Sumbe

– daya Manusia, Jakarta:

Prenhallindo

Fattah, Nanang. 2015. Landasan

Manajemen Pendidikan, bandung

; PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Gibson, James L., Invancevich, John M.,

dan Donnelly, Jame H. Jr., 2008.

Organisasi, alih bahasa Ir. Nunuk

Ardiani, MM. Jakarta: Bina

Aksara.

Handoko, T Hani, 2011. Manajemen

Personalia dan Sumber Daya

Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE

UGM.

Hamzah, 2012. Teori Motivasi dan

Pengukurannya :Analisis Di

Bidang Pendidikan. Cetaan

Ketiga. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Handoko, Hani., 2010.Manajemen,

BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Handoko, T Hani, 2010. Manajemen

Personalia dan Sumber Daya

Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE

UGM.

Maryoto, Susilo, 2013, Manajemen

Sumber Daya Manusia.

Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM.

Rumengan, Jemmy. 2010. Metodelogi

Penelitian dengan SPSS. Batam.

Uniba Press.

Rumengan, Jemmy. 2012. Metodologi

Penelitian dengan SPSS. Edisi

Kedua. Batam: Uniba Press.

Sedarmayanti, 2011, Manajemen Sumber

Daya Manusia, edisi I, Refika Aditama,

Bandung.

Siagian, P Sondang, 2011, Manajemen

Sumber Daya Manusia, Bumi

Aksara,

Jakarta.

Salusu, J. 2015. Pengambilan Keputusan

Sitrategik Jakarta: Grasindo.

Sutarto. 2011. DasarDasarKepemimpinanAdministras

i, Yokyakarta :Ghalia Indonesia

Sudjana. 2011. Metode Statistik.

Bandung Tarsito

Thamrin Abdullah, Hubungan Motivasi

Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja dan

Kemampuan Manajerial atasan dengan Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai

di Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Timpe, A Dale. 2010. Kinerja.

Terjemahan Sofyan Cikmat

Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Asri

Media.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-21