DETERMINATION OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT, WORKING ENVIRONMENT, WORKING DISCIPLINE WITH JOB SATISFACTION AS VARIABLE MEDIATOR TOWARDS WORK MOTIVATION AGENCY AND RESEARCH PLANNING OFFICERS DEVELOPMENT IN KARIMUN DISTRICT

Authors

  • Muhammad Rapi Batam University
  • Elli Widia Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i1.608

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 45. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely career development, work environment, work discipline, job satisfaction and employee motivation. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.009 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.006 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.033 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.006 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.014 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.039 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Rapi, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

Elli Widia, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Abonam, Nehorbuno Dominic. (2011).

The Roll Employee Performance in

the PublicSector: Thesis. Case Study

of the University for Development

Studies-Wa Campus.

Armstrong, Michael. (2011). Armstrong’s

Handbook of Human Resource

Management Practice 11th edition.

United Kingdom: Kogan Page.

Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C. F.,

Marsh, H. W., Larose, S., dan

Boivin, M. (2010). Intrinsic,

Identified, and Controlled Types of

Motivation For School Subject in

Young Elementary School Children.

British Journal of Educational

Psychology, 80(4), 711-735.

Kadarisman, Muh., (2014). Manajemen

Pengembangan Sumber Daya

Manusia.Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT

Rajagrafindo.

Khaddafi Muammar, Wahyuddin, heikal

Mohd, falahuddin and maulida

Rahmatul (2018), "Effect of Corporate

Governance Mechanism, Independence

and Management of Earnings Integrity

of Financial Statements" Journal Quality

Access to Success, Vol. 19, No.

/June 2018.

Khaddafi Muammar, Raza Hendra, Heikal

Mohd (2015), "Effect Of Budgetary

Participation And Budget Adequacy On

Individual Performance With Job

Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable"

International Journal of Economics,

Commerce and Management, Vol. III,

Issue 2, Feb 2015

Mathis, Robert, L., John, H., Jackson, &

Valentine, S.R. (2013). Human

Resource Management. Cengange

Learning. USA.

Masrukhin dan Waridin. (2011).

Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Kepuasan

Kerja, Budaya Organisasi Dan

Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja

Pegawai. EKOBIS. Vol. 7, no 2, hal.

-209.

Moeheriono. (2011). Pengukuran Kinerja

Berbasis Kompetensi. Ghalia

Indonesia, hal. 235-236. Jakarta

Mondy, R. Wayne. (2010). Manajemen

Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta:

Erlangga.

Moh. As’ad. (2011). Psikologi Industri.

Yogyakarta: Penerbit Liberty.

Martoyo, Susilo. (2011). Manajemen

Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi 5,

Cetakan Pertama, BPFE

Yogyakarta.

Marihot, Tua Efendi Hariandja. (2011).

Manajemen Sumber Daya

Manusia.Pengadaan,Pengembanga

n,Pengkompensasian, Peningkatan

Produktivitas Pegawai. Jakarta:

Grafindo.Muogbo, U.S. (2013). The Impact of

Employee Motivation On

Organisational Performance (A

Study Of Some Selected Firms In

Anambra State Nigeria). The

International Journal Of

Engineering And Science (IJES),

ISSN(e): 2319 – 1813 ISSN(p):

– 1805 Volume 2 Issue7

Pages 70-80.

Nelson, D.L dan J.C. Quick. (2010).

Organizational Behavior

Foundations Realities and

Challenges. Thompson South

Western, United States of

America.

Nitasari, Rizka Afrisalia & Eisha

Lataruva. (2012). “Analisis

Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja

Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan

Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai

Variabel Intervening Pada PT.

Bank Central Asia Tbk. Cabang

Kudusâ€. Diponegoro Journal of

Management Volume 1, nomor 2,

hal. 446-454.

Peter, Kisink, Bram Steijn. (2011). Public

Service Motivation and Job

Performance of Public sector

employees in the Netherland.

Internatonal review of

Administrative, science, vol 75,

No 1.pp. 35-52

Rumengan, J., Syarif, A., Rumengan, A.

E., Rumengan, M. T., &

Wibisono, C. (2020). The Effect

Work Autonomy, Feedback,

Responsibility, and Work

Knowledge on the Work

Motivation of Employees at

Batam University with Partial

Least Square (PLS). Talent

Development & Excellence , 12

(1), 1647-1655.

Rumengan, J., Suhardis, A., Rumengan,

M. T., Gunawan, D., & Hayadi, B.

H. (2020). Work Spirit

Determination, Work

Responsibility, And Work

Facilities With Work Motivation

As Intervening Variables To

Performance Of University

Employees Batam Using SEMPLS (Partial Least Square).

International Journal of

Psychosocial Rehabilitation , 24

(06), 5579 - 5589.

Rumengan Muhammad Tammy Ikbal,

Rumengan Jemmy, Manjang

Yunazar (2019), "Work Spirit

Determination, Work

Responsibility And Work

Facilities With Work Motivation

As Intervening Variables To

Performance Of University

Employees Batam Using SEMPLS (Partial Least Square)" Zona

Manajerial Vol: 9 No: 1, 2019.

Rumengan Muhammad Tommy Arby,

Rumengan Jemmy, Manjang

Yunazar (2019), "Work Discipline

Determination, Competence And

Work Environment With Work

Satisfaction As Variables

Intervening On Organizational

Commitments Pegawai Batam

University With Using SEM-PLS(Partial Least Square)", Zona

Manajerial Vol: 9 No: 1, 2019

Susan Were M. R .W Gakure. E. K

Kiraithe. A.G Waititu. (2012) .

Influence of Motivation on

Performance in the Public

Security Sector with a Focus to

the Police Force in Nairobi, Kenya

International Journal of Business

and Social Science Vol. 3 No 23;

pp. 195-204

Suwardi & Joko Utomo. (2011).

“Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja,

Kepuasan Kerja dan Komitmen

Organisasional Terhadap Kinerja

Pegawai (Studi Pada Pegawai

Setda Kabupaten Pati)â€. Jurnal

Analisis Manajemen Vol. 5 No. 1

Juli 2011. ISSN:14411-1799.

Teck Hong, Tan, Amna Waheed. (2011).

Herzberg's Motivation-Hygiene

Theory And Job Satisfaction In

The Malaysian Retail Sector: The

Mediating Effect of Love of

Money. Sunway University,

School of Business.5, Jalan

Universiti, Bandar Sunway 46150

Petaling Jaya. Selangor, Malaysia.

Asian Academy of Management

Journal, Vol. 16, No 1, pp. 73 –

Veithzal Rivai dan Ella J. Sagala. (2010).

Manajemen Sumber Daya

Manusia untuk Perusahaan: Dari

Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Raja

Grafindo Persada, hal. 266.

Winarti, Endang & Heru Susilo. (2012).

“Analisis Kinerja Pegawai

Dengan Kepuasan kerja Sebagai

Variabel Intervening dan Strategi

SDM Sebagai Variabel

Moderating (Studi Pada Dinas

Perindagkop dan UMKM

Kabupaten Demakâ€).

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09