DETERMINATION OF COMPETENCE, EDUCATION, SELF EFFICACY WITH THE SPIRIT OF WORK AS VARIABLE INTERVENING AGAINST EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE TANJUNG PINANG CITY EDUCATION OFFICE

Authors

  • Marsha Fajaryani Batam University
  • Jemmy Rumengan Batam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i2.621

Abstract

In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 42. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely competence, education, self efficacy, work spirit and employee performance. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The influence of the variable X3 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0.008 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 on X4 is significant. The influence of the variable X3 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 on X4 is significant. The influence of the variable X4 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.008 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X4 on Y is significant. The influence of the variable X1 to X4 has a P-Values value of 0.010 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X1 to X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X1 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.047 <0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 on Y is significant. The influence of the variable X2 on X4 has a P-Values value of 0,000 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence of X2 on X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X2 on Y has a P-Values value of 0.007 <0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X2 on Y is significant.

Author Biographies

Marsha Fajaryani, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

Jemmy Rumengan, Batam University

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics

References

Adijaya Zulkarnaen, Rumengan Jemmy, Rumengan Angelina Eleonora (2019) "Determination Of Position Promotion, Work Culture And Work Facilities With Work Satisfaction As Intervening Variables On Commitment Employee Agency Organization Of The France, Research And Development Riau Islands Province" Zona Manajemen Vol 9 No 3 2019

Anggaraini Nurafni Dwi, Rumengan Jemmy, Rumengan Angelina Eleonora (2019) "Determination Of Job Relevant Information, Work Motivation And Organizational Culture With Work Achievement As Intervening Variables To Performance Employee Of Financial Management Agency And The Assets Of The Islands Province" Zona Manajemen Vol 9. No 3. 2019.

Arikunto Suharsimi. 2011. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Davis, Keith., 2011. Fundamental Organization Behavior, DiterjemahkanAgus Dharma, Jakarta: Erlangga

Dessler, Gary., 2011, Manajemen Sumbe – daya Manusia, Jakarta: Prenhallindo

Fattah, Nanang. 2015. Landasan Manajemen Pendidikan, bandung ; PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Gibson, James L., Invancevich, John M., dan Donnelly, Jame H. Jr., 2008.

Organisasi, alih bahasa Ir. Nunuk Ardiani, MM. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Handoko, T Hani, 2011. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM.

Hamzah, 2012. Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya :Analisis Di Bidang Pendidikan. Cetaan Ketiga. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Handoko, Hani., 2010.Manajemen, BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Handoko, T Hani, 2010. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM.

Maryoto, Susilo, 2013, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM.

Rumengan, Jemmy. 2010. Metodelogi Penelitian dengan SPSS. Batam. Uniba Press.

Rumengan, Jemmy. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian dengan SPSS. Edisi Kedua. Batam: Uniba Press.

Sedarmayanti, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, edisi I, Refika Aditama,

Bandung.

Siagian, P Sondang, 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bumi Aksara,

Jakarta.

Salusu, J. 2015. Pengambilan Keputusan Sitrategik Jakarta: Grasindo.

Sutarto. 2011. Dasar-DasarKepemimpinanAdministrasi, Yokyakarta :Ghalia Indonesia

Sudjana. 2011. Metode Statistik. Bandung Tarsito

Thamrin Abdullah, Hubungan Motivasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja dan Kemampuan Manajerial atasan dengan Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai di Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Timpe, A Dale. 2010. Kinerja. Terjemahan Sofyan Cikmat Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Asri Media.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-21