DETERMINATION OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT, WORKING ENVIRONMENT, WORKING DISCIPLINE WITH JOB SATISFACTION AS VARIABLE MEDIATOR TOWARDS WORK MOTIVATION AGENCY AND RESEARCH PLANNING OFFICERS DEVELOPMENT IN KARIMUN DISTRICT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i2.623Abstract
In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 45. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely career development, work environment, work discipline, job satisfaction and employee motivation. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.009 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.006 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.033 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.006 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.014 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.039 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significant.References
Abonam, Nehorbuno Dominic. (2011). The Roll Employee Performance in the PublicSector: Thesis. Case Study of the University for Development Studies-Wa Campus.
Armstrong, Michael. (2011). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice 11th edition. United Kingdom: Kogan Page.
Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C. F., Marsh, H. W., Larose, S., dan Boivin, M. (2010). Intrinsic, Identified, and Controlled Types of Motivation For School Subject in Young Elementary School Children. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 80(4), 711-735.
Kadarisman, Muh., (2014). Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia.Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo.
Khaddafi Muammar, Wahyuddin, heikal Mohd, falahuddin and maulida
Rahmatul (2018), "Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanism, Independence and Management of Earnings Integrity of Financial Statements" Journal Quality Access to Success, Vol. 19, No. 164/June 2018.
Khaddafi Muammar, Raza Hendra, Heikal Mohd (2015), "Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Budget Adequacy On Individual Performance With Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable" International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. III, Issue 2, Feb 2015
Mathis, Robert, L., John, H., Jackson, & Valentine, S.R. (2013). Human Resource Management. Cengange Learning. USA.
Masrukhin dan Waridin. (2011). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja, Budaya Organisasi Dan Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. EKOBIS. Vol. 7, no 2, hal. 197-209.
Moeheriono. (2011). Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi. Ghalia Indonesia, hal. 235-236. Jakarta
Mondy, R. Wayne. (2010). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Moh. As’ad. (2011). Psikologi Industri. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Liberty.
Martoyo, Susilo. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi 5, Cetakan Pertama, BPFE Yogyakarta.
Marihot, Tua Efendi Hariandja. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Pengadaan,Pengembangan,Pengkompensasian, Peningkatan Produktivitas Pegawai. Jakarta: Grafindo.
Muogbo, U.S. (2013). The Impact of Employee Motivation On Organisational Performance (A Study Of Some Selected Firms In Anambra State Nigeria). The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES), ISSN(e): 2319 – 1813 ISSN(p): 2319 – 1805 Volume 2 Issue7 Pages 70-80.
Nelson, D.L dan J.C. Quick. (2010). Organizational Behavior Foundations Realities and Challenges. Thompson South Western, United States of America.
Nitasari, Rizka Afrisalia & Eisha Lataruva. (2012). “Analisis Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk. Cabang Kudusâ€. Diponegoro Journal of Management Volume 1, nomor 2, hal. 446-454.
Peter, Kisink, Bram Steijn. (2011). Public Service Motivation and Job Performance of Public sector employees in the Netherland. Internatonal review of Administrative, science, vol 75, No 1.pp. 35-52.
Rumengan Muhammad Tammy Ikbal, Rumengan Jemmy, Manjang Yunazar (2019), "Work Spirit Determination, Work Responsibility And Work Facilities With Work Motivation As Intervening Variables To Performance Of University Employees Batam Using SEM-PLS (Partial Least Square)" Zona Manajerial Vol: 9 No: 1, 2019.
Rumengan Muhammad Tommy Arby, Rumengan Jemmy, Manjang Yunazar (2019), "Work Discipline Determination, Competence And Work Environment With Work Satisfaction As Variables Intervening On Organizational Commitments Pegawai Batam University With Using SEM-PLS (Partial Least Square)", Zona Manajerial Vol: 9 No: 1, 2019
Susan Were M. R .W Gakure. E. K Kiraithe. A.G Waititu. (2012) . Influence of Motivation on Performance in the Public Security Sector with a Focus to the Police Force in Nairobi, Kenya International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 3 No 23; pp. 195-204
Suwardi & Joko Utomo. (2011). “Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasional Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai (Studi Pada Pegawai Setda Kabupaten Pati)â€. Jurnal Analisis Manajemen Vol. 5 No. 1 Juli 2011. ISSN:14411-1799.
Teck Hong, Tan, Amna Waheed. (2011). Herzberg's Motivation-Hygiene Theory And Job Satisfaction In The Malaysian Retail Sector: The Mediating Effect of Love of Money. Sunway University, School of Business.5, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Sunway 46150 Petaling Jaya. Selangor, Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 16, No 1, pp. 73 – 94.
Veithzal Rivai dan Ella J. Sagala. (2010). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan: Dari Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, hal. 266.
Winarti, Endang & Heru Susilo. (2012). “Analisis Kinerja Pegawai Dengan Kepuasan kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening dan Strategi SDM Sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi Pada Dinas Perindagkop dan UMKM Kabupaten Demakâ€).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuskrip yang diserahkan penulis haruslah sebuah karya yang tidak melanggar hak cipta (copyright) yang ada. Naskah yang dimasukkan harus yang belum pernah diterbitkan dan tidak dikirimkan pada waktu yang bersamaan kepada penerbit lain. Hak cipta atas semua material termasuk yang berbentuk cetak, elektronik dan bentuk lainnya dipegang oleh Jurnal Akuntansi. Setelah manuskrip telah melewati proses penyuntingan substansi dan positif diterima, penulis mengirimkan berkas Pernyataan Hak Cipta b ke alamat redaksi Jurnal Zona Manejerial.
