DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES OF WORK, EFFECTIVENESS, WORK FACILITIES WITH THE MOTIVATION OF WORK AS VARIABLES MEDIATOR ON THE ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT OF DISTRICT OFFICERS BEHIND PADANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37776/zm.v10i2.625Abstract
In this study, researchers used data respondents, such as gender, age and long working respondents to provide information on the characteristics of respondents. The questionnaire was spread over 52. The discussion in this chapter is the result of field studies to obtain data on the questionnaire responses that measure five key variables in the study, namely job responsibilities, effectiveness, work facilities, work motivation and employee organization commitments. Analysis of data with parametric and non parametrics statistics using SEM-PLS (structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Square) on the research variables, instrument test, normality test, hypothesis test, as well as discussion of the hypothesis test results and path analysis Path. This research uses path analysis to test relationship patterns that reveal the influence of variables or a set of variables against other variables, both direct influences and indirect influences. Calculation of line coefficient in this study assisted with Smart PLS Ver 3.0. To find out the direct and indirect influences between variables then be seen from the calculation result of the line coefficient and to know the significance. The effect of the X3 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.012 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X3 against X4 is significant. The effect of the variable X3 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.008 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the influence between X3 to Y is significant. The effect of X4 to Y variables has a P-Values value of 0.023 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X4 to Y is significant. The effect of the X1 variable against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.042 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 against X4 is significant. The effect of a X1 variable against Y has a P-Values value of 0.006 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect between X1 to Y is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against X4 has a P-Values value of 0.001 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of X2 against X4 is significant. The effect of a variable X2 against Y has a P-Values value of 0.005 < 0.05, so it can be stated that the effect of the X2 against Y is significantReferences
Adijaya Zulkarnaen, Rumengan Jemmy, Rumengan Angelina Eleonora (2019) "Determination Of Position Promotion, Work Culture And Work Facilities With Work Satisfaction As Intervening Variables On Commitment Employee Agency Organization Of The France, Research And Development Riau Islands Province" Zona Manajemen Vol 9 No 3 2019
Anggaraini Nurafni Dwi, Rumengan Jemmy, Rumengan Angelina Eleonora (2019) "Determination Of Job Relevant Information, Work Motivation And Organizational Culture With Work Achievement As Intervening Variables To Performance Employee Of Financial Management Agency And The Assets Of The Islands Province" Zona Manajemen Vol 9. No 3. 2019.
Ajeng Kartika, Sopranita. 2014. “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Motivasi Kerja Sebagai Variabel Moderatingâ€. Skripsi. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Al-Ahmadi, H. 2011. “Factors Affecting Performance of Hospital Nurses in Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabiaâ€. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 40-54
Armstrong, Michael. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Terjemahan oleh Sofyan Cikmat dan Haryanto. 2013. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Hadi, Syamsul. 2010. Metodeologi Penelitian Kuantitatif untuk Akuntansi & Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Ekonisia.
Handoko, T. Hani. 2010. Organization Perusahaan Teori Struktur Dan Perilaku. Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Handoko, Hani. 2011. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Hasibuan, Malayu SP. 2011. Organisasi Dan Motivasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ismail. Solihin, 2011. Pengantar Manajemen. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Kartono, Kartini. 2011. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Khaddafi Muammar, Wahyuddin, heikal Mohd, falahuddin and maulida Rahmatul (2018), "Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanism, Independence and Management of Earnings Integrity of Financial Statements" Journal Quality Access to Success, Vol. 19, No. 164/June 2018.
Khaddafi Muammar, Raza Hendra, Heikal Mohd (2015), "Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Budget Adequacy On Individual Performance With Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable" International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. III, Issue 2, Feb 2015
Kreitner dan Kinichi. 2010. Organization Behavior. Irwin. McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Luthans, F. 2014. Organization Behavior. New York: McGraw Hill International.
Mangkunegara, AA Anwar Prabu. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mas'ud, Fuad (2010), Survai Diagnosis Organisasional (Konsep dan Aplikasi). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Mathis dan Jackson. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Salemba Empat.
Moorhead dan Griffin. 2013. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Nafisah, Durrotun. 2010. “Analisis Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja, Komitmen Organisasi dan Kinerja Karyawanâ€. Skripsi Managemen. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro 2005.
Pamudji. 2011. Kepemimpinan Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Rumengan Muhammad Tammy Ikbal, Rumengan Jemmy, Manjang Yunazar (2019), "Work Spirit Determination, Work Responsibility And Work Facilities With Work Motivation As Intervening Variables To Performance Of University Employees Batam Using SEM-PLS (Partial Least Square)" Zona Manajerial Vol: 9 No: 1, 2019.
Rumengan Muhammad Tommy Arby, Rumengan Jemmy, Manjang Yunazar (2019), "Work Discipline Determination, Competence And Work Environment With Work Satisfaction As Variables Intervening On Organizational Commitments Pegawai Batam University With Using SEM-PLS (Partial Least Square)", Zona Manajerial Vol: 9 No: 1, 2019
Robbins, S. 2010. Perilaku Organisasi. Jilid 1 dan 11. Terjemahan oleh Hadyana Puja Atmaja. Jakarta: Prenhallindo.
Ruvendi, Ramlan. 2010. “Imbalan dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan di Balai Besar Industri Hasil Pertanian Bogorâ€. Jurnal Ilmiah Bianiag. Vol. 01 No. 1.
Setiyawan, Budi dan Waridin. 2010. “Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja Karyawan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Di Divisi Radiologi RSUP Dokter Kariadi Semarangâ€. Jurnal. JRBI Vol 2 No 2 Hal 181-19.
Supangat, Andi. 2010. Statistika Dalam Kajian Deskriptif, Inferensi dan Parametrik. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.
Trianingsih, Sri. 2010. “Independensi Auditor Dan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Mediasi Pengaruh Pemahaman Good Governance. Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Auditorâ€. Jurnal Simposium Akuntasi Nasional. Makasar: UNHAS.
Wahyudi, Bambang. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Sulita.
Wirawan. 2010. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia Teori, Aplikasi, dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Yulianto, Aan Eka. 2014. “Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Disiplin Kerja Dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan RS Asy-Syifa Sambiâ€. Skripsi. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuskrip yang diserahkan penulis haruslah sebuah karya yang tidak melanggar hak cipta (copyright) yang ada. Naskah yang dimasukkan harus yang belum pernah diterbitkan dan tidak dikirimkan pada waktu yang bersamaan kepada penerbit lain. Hak cipta atas semua material termasuk yang berbentuk cetak, elektronik dan bentuk lainnya dipegang oleh Jurnal Akuntansi. Setelah manuskrip telah melewati proses penyuntingan substansi dan positif diterima, penulis mengirimkan berkas Pernyataan Hak Cipta b ke alamat redaksi Jurnal Zona Manejerial.
